Lee J, Go J, Lee SJ
… +4 more, Kwon Y, Kim NH, Kim JY, Park HS
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40340261
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Oncologic and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) compared to conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (CNSM) is under investigation. This study compared the clinical outcomes of r...PURPOSE: Oncologic and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) compared to conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (CNSM) is under investigation. This study compared the clinical outcomes of recurrence-free survival and postoperative complication after RNSM and CNSM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 401 patients who underwent da Vinci Si/Xi/SP-assisted RNSM or CNSM with immediate reconstruction between November 2016 and November 2020 at a single institute. Oncological outcomes were collected until March 2022. Primary endpoints were long-term outcomes, such as local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, overall survival, and postoperative complications, while secondary endpoints were pathology results, and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Patients underwent RNSM (n=162) or CNSM (n=239). Of RNSM cases, 9 (5.6%) were performed using the da Vinci Si System, 96 (59.3%) using the da Vinci Xi System, and 57 (35.2%) using the da Vinci SP System. No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was found between the RNSM and CNSM group, and both groups had a median follow-up of 37 months. The recurrence rate in RNSM patients after a median follow-up of 24.5 months was 3.8%, compared with 5.9% in CNSM patients after a median follow-up of 42 months. No difference in recurrence was seen among RNSM patients with respect to surgical systems (multiport vs. SP, p =0.136). In addition, grade III postoperative complication rate was lower in patients with RNSM than in those with CNSM. Transfusion was only applied in 6.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgical systems can be safely used to perform nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.
Kim J, Kim MJ, Kim J
… +6 more, Park S, Jung HA, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Sun JM
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40302644
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Alectinib has been approved for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at 300 mg twice daily in Japan, lower than global standard of 600 mg twice daily. This study evaluated...PURPOSE: Alectinib has been approved for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at 300 mg twice daily in Japan, lower than global standard of 600 mg twice daily. This study evaluated the clinical relevance of the reduced dose by comparing outcomes between the two doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received alectinib at Samsung Medical Center, Korea. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, cumulative incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression, and safety profiles were retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS: Among 306 patients, 32 and 274 received alectinib at either 300 or 600 mg twice daily, respectively. The 300 mg group showed a slight but not significant advantage in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.51; p=0.51) and overall survival (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.21; p=0.13). Superior outcome with 300 mg was remarkable in patients with lower body weight (≤ 60 kg), but diminished in patients with higher body weights. Patients with baseline brain metastasis in the 300 mg group exhibited a slight increase in incidence of CNS failure (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.53 to 5.8; p=0.36). Although the safety profiles were mostly mild, adverse events were more frequent in the 600 mg group, 50% of which requiring dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Alectinib at 300 mg twice daily seems an acceptable dose in East Asians with ALK-positive NSCLC. Notably, our data favor 300 mg twice daily in patients with lower body weight and no baseline brain metastasis, considering the more tolerable safety profiles and the potential to reduce medical costs.
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40302643
·
Full text
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients who have already undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surge...PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients who have already undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a population-based cohort (2010-2020) were analyzed for BC patients treated with NAC and surgery. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), and a nomogram was developed and validated. Personalized scores from the nomogram were used for risk stratification to assess the effect of postoperative AC. RESULTS: A total of 15,921 BC patients were analyzed, with 11,144 in the training cohort and 4,777 in the validation cohort. The key prognostic indicators for OS included age, race, marital status, histological grade, BC subtype, T category, N category, type of surgery, and response to NAC (all p < 0.05). The nomogram effectively predicted individualized OS rates and stratified patients into various risk categories. Postoperative AC was found to significantly enhance OS in the high-risk subgroup (p=0.011 in the training cohort, p=0.012 in the overall population). However, for the low-risk subgroup, there was no significant survival benefit from postoperative AC (p=0.130 for the training cohort, p=0.588 for the overall population), suggesting that some patients might safely forgo unnecessary postoperative AC. CONCLUSION: This study efficiently differentiates between varying levels of risk, enabling clinicians to identify patients unlikely to benefit from postoperative AC and thus reduce the likelihood of overtreatment.
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40302642
·
Full text
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to summarize cancer risk among patients with clinical indications of immunosuppressive and antineoplastic drugs in Korea, which are pharmaceuticals defined as group 1 by International Ag...PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to summarize cancer risk among patients with clinical indications of immunosuppressive and antineoplastic drugs in Korea, which are pharmaceuticals defined as group 1 by International Agency for Research on Cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data from 2002 to 2018. Patients with clinical indications for group 1 pharmaceuticals from 2002 to 2017 were selected as baseline population, and followed up until 2018. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the risk of cancer and dose-response relationship between group 1 pharmaceuticals and cancer. RESULTS: Azathioprine use increased the risk of skin and hematologic cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 4.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91 to 7.39 and HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.41 to 4.13). Cyclosporine use increased the risk of skin and hematologic cancer (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.79 to 2.95 and HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.59 to 3.40). Cyclophosphamide use increased the risk of bladder and hematologic cancer (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.92 to 3.78 and HR, 3.83; 95% CI, 3.20 to 4.59). Chlorambucil use increased the risk of hematologic cancer (HR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.53 to 4.87) and melphalan use increased the risk of hematologic cancer (HR, 16.31; 95% CI, 13.41 to 19.85). Methoxsalen use increased the risk of skin cancer (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.95). CONCLUSION: Group 1 pharmaceuticals were associated with increased risk of cancer. The results are expected to help establish alternative clinical strategies and policies for patients with clinical indications of group 1 pharmaceuticals, by continuous risk analysis and discussions on the surveillance systems.
Yang C, Kim C, Kwak K
… +6 more, Kang KW, Park Y, Kim BS, Jeong SH, Park JS, Choi YS
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40302641
·
Full text
PURPOSE: This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a weekly carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (KCd) regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had been...PURPOSE: This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a weekly carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (KCd) regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had been previously treated with both bortezomib- and lenalidomide-containing regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 33 patients with RRMM who received the KCd regimen between March 2020 and February 2024. All patients had prior exposure to both bortezomib and lenalidomide, and the majority (93.9%) were refractory to lenalidomide. Carfilzomib was administered once weekly at 70 mg/m2 (after a step-up dose), along with oral cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Treatment response was assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 66.7%, including a complete response or better in 15.1% of patients and a very good partial response or better in 42.4%. With a median follow-up of 31.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval, 11.47 to 15.53), while the median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse event was neutropenia (15.2%). Non-hematologic grade ≥ 3 toxicities were infrequent and manageable. CONCLUSION: The weekly KCd regimen demonstrated encouraging efficacy and tolerability in a heavily pretreated RRMM population. These findings support its use as a feasible treatment option, particularly in patients refractory to lenalidomide.
Tong Z, Fu G, Zhou F
… +12 more, Liu X, Xue X, Zhang H, Wang Y, Zhu X, Gao Y, Liu L, Bao X, Zheng Y, Fang W, Zhao P, Jin B
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40302640
·
Full text
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer...PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients and the feasibility of the following selective bladder sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histopathologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma without distant metastases (T2-4a, N ≤ 1, M0, American Joint Committee of Cancer 8th) and with adequate organ function will be enrolled. The therapeutic regimen was sintilimab 200 mg once on day 8, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for four cycles. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0) rate. The secondary end points were ypT < 2 rate, R0 resection rate, event-free survival, and safety. RESULTS: From May 4, 2020, to May 20, 2023, 55 patients were enrolled. Forty-six patients were evaluated for efficacy. Among the 42 patients who underwent surgery, 16 patients (38.0%) achieved pCR. Thirty-three patients (78.6%) achieved pT < 2. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months, the 1-year event-free survival was 91.3%. Notwithstanding the poor pathological baseline characteristic of a high T3-T4a proportion (39.1%), a promising bladder preservation (including 22 patients transurethral resection of bladder tumor, 5 patients partial cystectomy, and 4 surveillances) rate was achieved (67.4%). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events was neutropenia (n=15, 27.3%), which was related to chemotherapy. There were no grade 3 immune-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant GP plus sintilimab is a promising regimen for MIBC patients, with relatively high pT < 2 rate and triggering the emerging roles for the multi-disciplinary team decision-making for bladder sparing surgery.
Chae YS, Kwon KA, Lee MH
… +9 more, Ahn MS, Lee KH, Koh SJ, Sohn J, Park KU, Kim MY, Pyo Y, Kim BY, Jung KH
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40302639
·
Full text
PURPOSE: This 6-year post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was conducted in South Korea to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of eribulin in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously t...PURPOSE: This 6-year post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was conducted in South Korea to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of eribulin in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the study period (17 August 2012 to 16 August 2018), case-report files (CRFs) of patients receiving eribulin were collected. The main study endpoint was to assess the safety of eribulin. Evaluation of the effectiveness of eribulin was an exploratory endpoint. Patients were followed for 1 year after eribulin initiation. RESULTS: CRFs were collected from 64 investigators at 64 sites for 1,079 patients. The safety analysis set (SAS) included 1,001 eribulin recipients; effectiveness was assessed in 244 patients. In the SAS, patients were predominantly female (99.6%), with a median age of 53.0 years, and diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (92.0%). Eribulin was administered as a median 4th line chemotherapy. A total of 2,124 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 661 patients (66.0%). Neutropenia was the most common TEAE (32.5% of patients), occurring at a median of 9-11 days from initial eribulin administration. Overall response and disease control rates were 31.7% and 95.6%, respectively, and the median duration of eribulin use (time to treatment failure) was 3.0 months. CONCLUSION: This large real-world PMS analysis in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer demonstrated the effectiveness of eribulin and found no new safety concerns relative to safety information from prior clinical and real-world studies, and approvals in South Korea and other countries.
Oh T, Kim M, Kang GS
… +6 more, Ye SJ, Choi C, Park W, Hay M, Hirata H, Ahn GO
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40302638
·
Full text
It is extensively documented that tumor hypoxia contributes to the failure of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recent evidence suggests that hypoxia is also closely involved in the resistance to immunotherapy. In this revi...It is extensively documented that tumor hypoxia contributes to the failure of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recent evidence suggests that hypoxia is also closely involved in the resistance to immunotherapy. In this review, we highlight how immune cells that are essential for the maximized immunotherapy efficacy, including cytotoxic T cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells, can adapt to tumor hypoxia. We then outline previous attempts targeting tumor hypoxia (for example, modulators of tumor cell oxygen consumption, perfusion modulators, hypoxia-activated prodrugs, hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitors, and hypoxia-responsive chimeric antigen receptor T cells) discussing how these approaches have resulted in an improvement of the antitumor response to immunotherapy in preclinical or clinical settings. Lastly, we review various non-invasive techniques to detect the tumor hypoxia and immune responses. We believe that an integration of the biological knowledge of immune cell adaptation to tumor hypoxia with the cutting edge non-invasive imaging technologies may ultimately allow us not only to select for patients who would benefit the most from the immunotherapy but also to monitor their responses in a real-time manner so that we can offer them an optimal personalized medicine in the clinic.
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40259805
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Ras association domain family 4 (RASSF4) is a putative tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in multiple human cancers. However, its candidacy as a suppressor in gastric tumorigenesis remains undefined...PURPOSE: Ras association domain family 4 (RASSF4) is a putative tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in multiple human cancers. However, its candidacy as a suppressor in gastric tumorigenesis remains undefined. To understand the role for RASSF4 in gastric tumorigenesis, we investigated its expression status in cancer cell lines and tissues and regulatory role in tumor growth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RASSF4 expression was analyzed in 13 cancer cell lines and 20 carcinoma tissues using polymerase chain reaction and immunoblot assays. RASSF4 effect on cell proliferation and apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry, colony formation, and [3H]thymidine incorporation assays and its regulation of p53 was determined using cycloheximide chase, promoter reporter, and immunoprecipitation assays. Mouse xenograft assay was performed to verify RASSF4 effect on tumor growth and therapeutic response. RESULTS: RASSF4 expression is epigenetically inactivated in eight of 13 (61.5%) cancer cell lines and 15 of 20 (75%) primary carcinomas. RASSF4 suppresses cell proliferation by inducing a G2/M cell cycle arrest and enhances apoptotic response to therapeutic drugs. RASSF4 is induced in response to genotoxic agents to facilitate stress-induced apoptosis in a highly p53-dependent fashion. Mechanistically, RASSF4 stabilizes p53 through Chk2 activation and its apoptotic function is profoundly impaired by depletion of either p53 or Chk2. RASSF4 attenuates xenograft tumor growth and enhances tumor response to 5-fluorouracil. Clinically, RASSF4 expression correlates strongly with the overall survival of gastric cancer patients. CONCLUSION: RASSF4 suppresses gastric tumor growth through the activation of the Chk2-p53 axis, illuminating the mechanistic consequence of its inactivation in gastric tumorigenesis.
Chen J, Zeng A, Yu Y
… +6 more, Sun S, Liao L, Huang S, Yang Z, Zhou J, Wu W
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40259804
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Lung cancer is frequently observed as a second primary malignancy following gastric cancer, yet the genetic causality between them remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the causal relationship between g...PURPOSE: Lung cancer is frequently observed as a second primary malignancy following gastric cancer, yet the genetic causality between them remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the causal relationship between gastric and lung cancers using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with gastric and lung cancers were selected from genome-wide association study in East Asian and European populations as instrumental variables. The causal effects between gastric and lung cancers were evaluated using univariable and multivariable MR analysis, with the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method serving as the primary criterion. Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: Univariable MR analysis demonstrated that genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer in the European population was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (IVW: odds ratio [OR], 1.285; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.072 to 1.541; p=6.83E-03), which was consistently validated in the East Asian population (IVW: OR, 1.356; 95% CI, 1.114 to 1.651; p=2.40E-03). Multivariable MR analysis further indicated that the significant positive causal relationship between gastric cancer and lung cancer persisted in both populations after adjusting for confounding factors (all p < 0.05). Conversely, no significant causal relationship was observed for the risk of developing gastric cancer following the diagnosis of lung cancer in either population (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer increases the risk of lung cancer. This finding provides a theoretical basis for exploring the underlying biological mechanisms and suggests that enhancing lung cancer screening in patients with gastric cancer may be necessary to improve patient prognosis.
Ma L, Zheng R, Xu L
… +6 more, Zhu Y, Yin H, Zhang X, Deng R, Wang J, Zha X
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Apr · PMID 40259803
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Dual anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) drugs have become the standard regimen for neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) to HER2-positive breast cancer patients. However, the efficacy varies gre...PURPOSE: Dual anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) drugs have become the standard regimen for neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) to HER2-positive breast cancer patients. However, the efficacy varies greatly among patients with different HER2 protein expression levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 575 HER2-positive breast cancer patients from multiple centers throughout China from 2013 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared clinicopathological features in different HER2 immunohistochemistry classes (HER2 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH] + or HER2 3+), and their difference in response to NST and survival with single or dual anti-HER2 drugs. Drug sensitivity assays were used to evaluate different efficacy of anti-HER2 drugs in vitro. RESULTS: Compared to HER2 3+ subgroup, the HER2 2+/ISH+ group had a higher proportion of hormone receptor-positive status (48.7% vs. 76.1%, p < 0.001), more HER2 protein loss after NST, lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate (46.07% vs. 16.24%, p < 0.001), and tended to have worse disease-free survival (DFS). In HER2 2+/ISH+ patients, treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in combination had no significant improvement in pCR (19.12% vs. 12.24%, p=0.287) and DFS (p=0.908) than using alone. Drug sensitivity assay showed poor efficacy with dual anti-HER2 drugs in HER2 2+/ISH+ cell lines; however, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan drugs had a satisfactory effect. CONCLUSION: Owing to the differences in clinicopathological features and treatment efficacy, we considered the HER2 2+/ISH+ group to be a distinct subtype and defined it as the HER2-moderate-positive subgroup. In this subgroup, dual anti-HER2 drugs did not exert significant improvement in pCR and DFS. Therefore, treatment optimization is warranted, with antibody-drug conjugate drugs as potential options.
Park SS, Choi S, Jung S
… +6 more, Han S, Lee C, Han J, Kim S, Kim K, Min CK
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40241581
·
Full text
PURPOSE: High-cost novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) require evaluation of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study developed a methodology to assess cost-effectiveness using nationwide...PURPOSE: High-cost novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) require evaluation of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study developed a methodology to assess cost-effectiveness using nationwide data from 11,450 newly diagnosed MM patients. A novel algorithm was applied to identify lines of therapy (LoT). RESULTS: The number of newly diagnosed MM patients increased significantly, from 873 in 2010 to 1,464 in 2019 (p < 0.001). Advancing LoT was associated with shorter time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001), while all-cause medical costs increased with each LoT (p < 0.001). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone was the most common frontline regimen for transplant-ineligible patients (29.2%), while bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone was most used for transplant-eligible patients (11.3%). Daratumumab monotherapy demonstrated superior second TTNT (7.8 vs. 5.2 months) and OS (8.5 vs. 5.3 months) compared to standard care in heavily treated MM patients, with statistical significance maintained after cost adjustment. For subsequent therapies following daratumumab, a methodology was developed to estimate required medical costs using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): Expected cost ($)=ICER×(Expected life expectancy-0.567)+35,601. CONCLUSION: This study provides a novel cost-effectiveness framework linking treatment efficacy and real-world costs, supporting predictions of societal costs for future MM therapies.
Byeon J, Lim C, Kang E
… +5 more, Jung JJ, Kim HK, Lee HB, Moon HG, Han W
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40241580
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using dye and isotope (DUAL) is recommended over the dye-only (DYE) method after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) due to potentially lower false-negative rates. However, the long-...PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using dye and isotope (DUAL) is recommended over the dye-only (DYE) method after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) due to potentially lower false-negative rates. However, the long-term outcome of either method is unclear. We aimed to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of DYE versus DUAL SLNB methods in patients who received NCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 893 patients who underwent SLNB following NCT and had pathologically negative lymph nodes were included. After propensity score matching for cT, cN, and pT categories, 280 patients were in the DYE group and 560 in the DUAL group. Indigo carmine was used for dye and Tc-99m antimony trisulfate for isotope mapping. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 75.6 months in the DYE group and 83.0 months in the DUAL group. Mean (±standard deviation) number of harvested sentinel nodes was 6.7 (±3.9) and 6.7 (±3.3) in the DYE and DUAL groups (p=0.875). Five-year distant metastasisfree survival was 95.2% in DYE group and 93.3% in DUAL group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 2.57; p=0.192). Disease-free survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.50; p=0.914) and overall survival (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.69; p=0.954) were not significantly different. Axillary recurrence rate was 1.8% and 2.5% in DYE and DUAL groups (p=0.647). CONCLUSION: Long-term oncological outcomes did not significantly differ between DYE and DUAL SLNB methods. The dye-only method can be safely recommended for breast cancer patients who received NCT.
Yoo J, Park I, Kim HJ
… +4 more, Park HH, Lee S, Kim JH, Cha YJ
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40241579
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a particularly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, with approximately 30% of patients eventually developing brain metastases (BM), which result in poor outcomes. An under...PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a particularly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, with approximately 30% of patients eventually developing brain metastases (BM), which result in poor outcomes. An understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) at both primary and metastatic sites offers insights into the mechanisms underlying BM and potential therapeutic targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spatial RNA sequencing (spRNA-seq) was performed on primary TNBC and paired BM tissues from three patients, one of whom had previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors before BM diagnosis. Specimen regions were categorized into tumor, proximal, and distal TME based on their spatial locations. Gene expression differences across these zones were analyzed, and immune cell infiltration was estimated using TIMER. A gene module analysis was conducted to identify key gene clusters associated with BM. RESULTS: Distinct gene expression profiles were noted in the proximal and distal TMEs. In BM, the proximal TME exhibited neuronal gene expression, suggesting neuron-tumor interactions compared to tumor, and upregulation of epithelial genes compared to the distal TME. Immune cell analysis revealed dynamic changes in CD8+ T cells and macrophages across the tumor and TME zones. Gene module analysis identified five key modules, including one related to glycolysis, which correlated with patient survival. Drug repurposing analysis identified potential therapeutic targets, including VEGFA, RAC1, EGLN3, and CAMK1D. CONCLUSION: This study provides novel insights into the transcriptional landscapes in TNBC BM using spRNA-seq, emphasizing the role of neuron-tumor interactions and immune dynamics. These findings suggest new therapeutic strategies and underscore the importance of further research.
Jung YB, Ahn HK, Shin HY
… +2 more, Hong JH, Rim CH
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40241578
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Guidelines from the aromatase inhibitor era for early breast cancer (EBC) treatment recommend maintaining a body mass index (BMI) below 25. In the current era of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, now...PURPOSE: Guidelines from the aromatase inhibitor era for early breast cancer (EBC) treatment recommend maintaining a body mass index (BMI) below 25. In the current era of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, now standard in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), limited data exist on treatment outcomes in obese patients. This study investigates how adiposity affects the treatment outcome of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases, assessing efficacy outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS) based on obesity markers, including BMI and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) index. RESULTS: Twelve studies were reviewed, with seven studies and 1,812 patients included in a pooled meta-analysis. Among patients with BMI ≥ 25, modest improvement in PFS was observed, with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.944 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.909 to 0.980; p=0.003). Besides, add-on analysis using VAT to define obesity revealed a notable PFS improvement, with a pooled HR of 0.452 (95% CI, 0.256 to 0.798; p=0.006). CONCLUSION: While BMI-defined obesity showed slight PFS improvement with CDK 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy, using VAT to define obesity revealed significant PFS gains. This highlights the need for further research on biomarker to clarify the role of adiposity in MBC, which may differ from its impact in EBC.
Choi Y, Kim N, Kim JH
… +21 more, Jo HH, Oh HJ, Lee HS, Jun YK, Yoon H, Shin CM, Park YS, Lee DH, Kang SH, Park YS, Ahn SH, Suh YS, Park DJ, Kim HH, Kim JW, Kim JW, Lee KW, Chang W, Lee YJ, Lee KH, Kim YH
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40241577
·
Full text
PURPOSE: The male predominance in the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is established; however, sex differences in the prognosis of GC remain controversial. As such, this study analyzed the prognosis of patients with GC...PURPOSE: The male predominance in the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is established; however, sex differences in the prognosis of GC remain controversial. As such, this study analyzed the prognosis of patients with GC based on age and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 14,739 patients diagnosed with GC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2023 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, histological types of GC, overall and GC-specific survival rates (age and stage stratification), and associated risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Females were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and exhibited more gastric body cancers (p < 0.001) and tumors with diffuse-type or poorly differentiated histology (p < 0.001) than males. Females exhibited an advantage over males in terms of overall survival (p=0.004), but not in GC-specific survival. However, age stratification revealed significant sex differences, that females < 50 years of age exhibited survival disadvantages (p < 0.001); however, this trend was reversed with age, and females > 60 years exhibited survival advantages (p < 0.001) for both overall and GC-specific survival. This may be explained by the lower ratio of diffuse-type GC as females age. Furthermore, in the analysis according to stage, females with stage IV disease exhibited significant survival disadvantages, with significantly younger age and a higher proportion of diffuse-type GC which exhibits aggressive features, resulting in poorer survival than in males. CONCLUSION: Age and stage stratification revealed significant differences in survival between the sexes, which can be helpful for public health strategies.
Kim M, Min A, Kim S
… +9 more, Kim S, Kim YJ, Ham S, Lee M, Lee EY, Kim J, Lee DW, Lee KH, Im SA
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40211813
·
Full text
PURPOSE: Sustained cell proliferation and cell cycle acceleration in cancer cells inherently increase DNA damage, which interferes with homeostatic replication and transcription. Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (A...PURPOSE: Sustained cell proliferation and cell cycle acceleration in cancer cells inherently increase DNA damage, which interferes with homeostatic replication and transcription. Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) is crucial for initiation of the DNA damage response, and ATR inhibitors, such as elimusertib, induce increased replication stress and DNA damage. We investigated the anti-tumor effects of elimusertib and its mechanism of action in relation to replication stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anti-tumor effects were evaluated by MTT assay and colony formation assay in breast cancer cell lines in vitro, in breast cancer cell xenografts in vivo, and in patient-derived xenograft models. Cell cycle was assessed by flow cytometry and BrdU assay was used to measure replicating cells and S-phase progression. Alkaline and neutral comet assay was used to measure single and double-stranded DNA damages, respectively. RESULTS: Elimusertib delayed S-phase progression in MDA-MB-453 and MDA-MB-231 cells and induced caspase-7-dependent apoptosis. Furthermore, the increase in sub-G1 population in the fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and Annexin V assay also confirmed apoptotic cell death. In the BrdU assay, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) increased in sensitive cells and aberrant ssDNA induced DNA damage in S-phase and eventually caused replication catastrophe. Finally, these anti-tumor effects were proven in in vivo xenograft and patient-derived xenograft models. CONCLUSION: Elimusertib had anti-tumor effects and induced replication catastrophe in breast cancer cells with a high replication rate. Moreover, cells under high DNA replication stress were sensitive to elimusertib. Further studies and treatment strategies with elimusertib are warranted for cancers with a high replication rate.
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40211812
·
Full text
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of locoregional failure after reduced dose selective neck irradiation (RD-SNI) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2022, 342...PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of locoregional failure after reduced dose selective neck irradiation (RD-SNI) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2022, 342 OPC patients underwent definitive radiation therapy (with or without concurrent systemic therapy). The doses of 67.2-68.4 Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV), 56-60 Gy to high-risk clinical target volumes (CTV-HR), and 32-36 Gy to low-risk clinical target volumes (CTV-LR) were irradiated. The same target delineation and dosing policy were applied to all patients regardless of human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Oncological outcomes including failure patterns were also investigated. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 60.3 months (range, 1.4 to 196.6 months), the 3- and 5-year locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 91.6%/90.7%, 83.7%/80.7%, 78.7%/74.8%, and 91.0%/85.8%, respectively. The HPV-positive patients exhibited significantly better outcomes. Treatment failure occurred in 61 patients (17.8%); 37 (10.8%) had distant metastasis, 22 (6.4%) had local failure, and eight (2.3%) had regional failure. GTV failure was significantly more common in HPV-negative patients (p=0.003). Among the 27 patients with locoregional failure, either GTV and/or CTV-HR failure occurred in 22 (81.5%), with CTV-LR failure in one (3.7%), and out-target regional (OTR) failure in five (18.5%). Only five failures (1.5%) could be attributed to the current RD-SNI policy: one CTV-LR failure (0.3%) reflecting the RD policy and four OTR failures (1.2%) reflecting the SNI policy. CONCLUSION: Excellent oncological outcomes were achieved with the current RD-SNI policy.
Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Jeung YS
… +10 more, Kim JS, Park K, Nam EM, Lee SW, Ji JH, Kim JH, Hur JY, Park SE, Lee JL, Koh SJ
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40211811
·
Full text
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the practices, perceptions, and barriers related to specialty palliative care (SPC) referrals among oncologists in Korea, highlighting the clinical implications of early integration....PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the practices, perceptions, and barriers related to specialty palliative care (SPC) referrals among oncologists in Korea, highlighting the clinical implications of early integration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey targeting board-certified hemato-oncology specialists was conducted between August 1-25, 2024. The survey assessed referral practices, attitudes toward early SPC integration, referral criteria, barriers, and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 227 oncologists participated (response rate, 36.7%). Among them, 68.7% reported frequent SPC referrals, with higher referral rates observed among younger physicians, those in tertiary hospitals, and institutions with in-house SPC teams (p < 0.001). Although 74.9% supported early SPC integration, referrals were often inconsistently timed, frequently occurring after disease progression or at the discontinuation of chemotherapy. For time-based referrals, the most commonly endorsed triggers were disease progression despite palliative second-line treatment and a prognosis of expected mortality within 6-12 months. Need-based referral triggers such as patient or family requests (96.5%), psychological distress (89.9%), or uncontrolled symptoms (83.3%), were also widely endorsed. The major barriers to early SPC integration included patient and family resistance (70.0%) and limited availability of SPC teams (34.4%). CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of systematic efforts to promote timely SPC integration in Korea, including education to raise patient awareness, improved referral systems, and enhanced infrastructure. The positive attitudes toward early SPC among oncologists reflect a growing recognition of its value, highlighting the need for strategies that align with international standards.
Cancer Res Treat
· 2026 Jan · PMID 40181740
·
Full text
PURPOSE: The effect of behavior changes in alcohol drinking on gastric cancer (GC) development, and the sex differences in those effects have not yet been fully elucidated. This study investigated the effect of behavior...PURPOSE: The effect of behavior changes in alcohol drinking on gastric cancer (GC) development, and the sex differences in those effects have not yet been fully elucidated. This study investigated the effect of behavior changes in alcohol drinking on the GC risk by sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 310,192 Koreans (≥ 40 years) from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort with a median follow-up period of 12 years. Subjects were classified according to alcohol consumption behavior changes (non-drinker, quitter, reducer, sustainer, and increaser). The independent effect of changes in alcohol drinking patterns or concurrent effect of alcohol on GC risk were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: In males, non-drinkers showed a lower risk of developing GC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.98), whereas increasers showed a higher risk of GC than sustainers (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20). Starting to drink alcohol, even at a mild level, was associated with an increased GC risk, while a decreased GC risk was induced when alcohol consumption dose decreases to a mild from a moderate level among males. However, in females, only substantial change of alcohol consumption dose from non- to heavy-drinking was associated with increased GC risk (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 0.98 to 3.96). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that alcohol abstinence can reduce the risk of developing GC, particularly among males.