It is essential not to delay behavior management and control for aggression, violence, and impulsive behavior in young people. Clozapine has been widely used in adolescents and adults to manage violence and aggression in...It is essential not to delay behavior management and control for aggression, violence, and impulsive behavior in young people. Clozapine has been widely used in adolescents and adults to manage violence and aggression in Schizophrenia. However, there are limited data on the use of clozapine in children, and no systematic review has addressed its use in this population. To better understand the conditions under which clozapine is used as a therapeutic alternative for nonschizophrenic diagnoses and to assess the current evidence supporting its prescription to children, a systematic review was conducted. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO under the ID CRD42024537707. The review identified that all the studies used clozapine to address externalizing behavior, particularly aggressive behavior, and found positive outcomes supporting its use for treating children with treatment-resistant aggression. The studies also found that clozapine was well-tolerated in all cases. However, the studies were limited and mainly consisted of open trials without a control group. Further high-quality research is needed to establish precise guidelines for using clozapine in children.
Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications are being prescribed to children and adolescents along a broad age range from 2 to 17 years old. However, there is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approve...Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications are being prescribed to children and adolescents along a broad age range from 2 to 17 years old. However, there is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indication for the use of any LAI in a pediatric population. The goal of this article is to perform a systematic literature review regarding the use of LAIs in a pediatric population, to obtain pediatric LAI safety data, and to survey prescriber attitudes regarding LAI use in youth. A search for relevant articles between June 1986 and June 2021 was conducted. Safety data were obtained from FDA MedWatch postmarketing adverse event reports regarding LAI use in children and adolescents. A survey of practicing Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists in Wisconsin was done regarding the use of LAIs in youth. The predominant reasons for LAI use in youth were illness severity and treatment noncompliance. Twenty-six of 30 identified studies and reports favored LAI use in youth, but were of low to very low quality. Overall, 587 FDA MedWatch reports between June 1986 and June 2021 were identified. Most adverse events occurred in modest numbers. Extrapyramidal symptoms accounted for 18% of all MedWatch reports, neuroleptic malignant syndrome accounted for 3% of all reports, and deaths accounted for 2% of all reports. The concern for safety was reflected in prescriber survey results along with a recognition that LAIs can be helpful to target severe psychiatric symptoms and address treatment noncompliance. No randomized controlled studies were found. Identified published studies and reports were of low to very low quality. However, it appeared reasonable that the use of LAIs in a select group of pediatric patients can be helpful to target severe psychiatric symptoms and to enhance treatment compliance.
Exposure to a range of stressful life events (SLE) is implicated in youth psychopathology. Previous studies point to a discrepancy between parents'/children's reports regarding stressful life events. No study systematica...Exposure to a range of stressful life events (SLE) is implicated in youth psychopathology. Previous studies point to a discrepancy between parents'/children's reports regarding stressful life events. No study systematically assessed the correlation between such discrepancies and psychopathology in depressed youth. This study was designed to assess parent-youth discrepancies regarding stressful life events and its association with severity of psychopathology at baseline and response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment in depressed youth. Reports regarding stressful life events were assessed in children/adolescents suffering from depressive/anxiety disorders using the life events checklist (LEC), a self-report questionnaire measuring the impact of negative life events (NLE) and positive life events (PLE), as reported by the children and their parents. The severity of depression/anxiety disorders and response to antidepressant treatment were evaluated and correlated with both measures of LEC. Participants were 96 parent-child dyads (39 boys, 57 girls) aged 6-18 years (mean = 13.90 years, SD = 2.41). Parents reported more NLE and higher severity of NLE events than their children (number of NLE: 7.51 ± 4.17 vs. 6.04 ± 5.32; Cumulative severity of NLE: 24.95 ± 14.83 vs. 17.24 ± 12.94). Discrepancy in PLE, but not NLE, was associated with more severe psychopathology and reduced response to treatment. Discrepancy in informant reports regarding life events in depressed/anxious youth, especially regarding PLE, is associated with more severe psychopathology and reduced response to pharmacotherapy. It is essential to use multiple reporters in assessing stressful life events in children.
Farhat LC, Behling E, Landeros-Weisenberger A
… +4 more, Macul Ferreira de Barros P, Polanczyk GV, Cortese S, Bloch MH
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol
· 2024 Nov · PMID 39320340
·
Full text
To evaluate the comparative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with a dual diagnosis of persistent tic disorders or Tourette disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (TD +...To evaluate the comparative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with a dual diagnosis of persistent tic disorders or Tourette disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (TD + ADHD). We searched CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Sciences, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP up to September 2023 to identify double-blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with TD + ADHD. Outcomes were change in ADHD symptoms (primary) and tics (secondary) severity. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated and pooled in random-effects network meta-analysis. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework was adopted to determine certainty of evidence. We included 8 RCTs involving 575 participants. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that α2 agonists (SMD, 95% confidence interval [CI] ADHD: -0.72 [-1.13 to -0.31]; TD: -0.70 [-0.96 to -0.45]) and stimulants + α2 agonists (ADHD: -0.84 [-1.54 to -0.13]; TD: -0.60 [-1.04 to -0.17]) were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms and tics severity. Stimulants alone were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms severity only, but they did not worsen tics (ADHD: -0.54 [-1.05 to -0.03]; TD: -0.22 [-0.49 to 0.05]). There were no significant differences between any pairs of medications that were found efficacious against placebo for ADHD symptoms or tics severity. Certainty in the evidence varied from low to very low. Stimulants are efficacious for ADHD symptoms severity and do not increase tics severity in TD + ADHD. α2 agonists are efficacious for both ADHD symptoms and tics severity in TD + ADHD. These findings should inform guidelines and help guide shared decision-making to choose a medication for children with TD + ADHD.
To provide an evidence-based review of the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tic (CBIT) disorders. For close to a century, behavioral interventions for managing tics associated with Tourette and other tic disord...To provide an evidence-based review of the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tic (CBIT) disorders. For close to a century, behavioral interventions for managing tics associated with Tourette and other tic disorders (TDs) were incorrectly considered ineffective and dangerous by the professional community, due, in large part, to unfounded fears that efforts to suppress tics would lead to a host of negative psychological, and even physical, outcomes (e.g., symptom substitution, tic rebound). Spurred by a growing body of research to the contrary, the Comprehensive Behavioral Treatment for Tics (CBIT) was developed to provide a tolerable and effective nonpharmacological treatment option, alone or in combination with medication, for youth and adults with tics associated with Tourette or other TDs. CBIT combines two evidence-based practices, habit reversal training (HRT) to address the urge-tic relationship and a functional intervention to identify and neutralize tic-related environmental factors. Based on positive findings from two large-scale randomized controlled trials that involved a total of 248 8-69-year olds with Tourette or chronic TD, CBIT has been designated as a first-line treatment, when available, for treating tics by the American Academy of Neurology and the European and Canadian medical academies. CBIT has demonstrated acute and durable efficacy when delivered alone or in combination with medication, in person, or via telehealth, and in the presence or absence of common comorbid conditions. Additional research is needed to develop and test treatment guidelines for the use of CBIT in combination with pharmacologic, neuromodulatory, and other intervention modalities.
Ray WA, Fuchs DC, Olfson M
… +4 more, Stein CM, Murray KT, Daugherty J, Cooper WO
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol
· 2024 Nov · PMID 39268665
·
Full text
The incidence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a rare, potentially fatal adverse effect of antipsychotics, among children and youth is unknown. This cohort study estimated NMS incidence in antipsychotic users age...The incidence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a rare, potentially fatal adverse effect of antipsychotics, among children and youth is unknown. This cohort study estimated NMS incidence in antipsychotic users age 5-24 years and described its variation according to patient and antipsychotic characteristics. We used national Medicaid data (2004-2013) to identify patients beginning antipsychotic treatment and calculated the incidence of NMS during antipsychotic current use. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) assessed the independent contribution of patient and antipsychotic characteristics to NMS risk. The 1,032,084 patients had 131 NMS cases during 1,472,558 person-years of antipsychotic current use, or 8.9 per 100,000 person-years. The following five factors independently predicted increased incidence: age 18-24 years (HR [95% CI] = 2.45 [1.65-3.63]), schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (HR = 5.86 [3.16-10.88]), neurodevelopmental disorders (HR = 7.11 [4.02-12.56]), antipsychotic dose >200mg chlorpromazine-equivalents (HR = 1.71 [1.15-2.54]), and first-generation antipsychotics (HR = 4.32 [2.74-6.82]). NMS incidence per 100,000 person-years increased from 1.8 (1.1-3.0) for those with none of these factors to 198.1 (132.8-295.6) for those with 4 or 5 factors. Findings were essentially unchanged in sensitivity analyses that restricted the study data to second-generation antipsychotics, children age 5-17 years, and the 5 most recent calendar years. In children and youth treated with antipsychotics, five factors independently identified patients with increased NMS incidence: age 18-24 years, schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, first-generation drugs, and antipsychotic doses greater than 200 mg chlorpromazine-equivalents. Patients with 4 or 5 of these factors had more than 100 times the incidence of those with none. These findings could improve early identification of children and youth with elevated NMS risk, potentially leading to earlier detection and improved outcomes.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications significantly reduce symptomatology at a group level, but individual response to ADHD medication is variable...Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications significantly reduce symptomatology at a group level, but individual response to ADHD medication is variable. Thus, developing prediction models to stratify treatment according to individual baseline clinicodemographic characteristics is crucial to support clinical practice. A potential valuable source of data to develop accurate prediction models is real-world clinical data extracted from electronic healthcare records (EHRs). Yet, systematic information regarding EHR data on ADHD is lacking. We conducted a comprehensive review of studies that included EHR reporting data regarding individuals with ADHD, with a specific focus on treatment-related data. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases up to February 24, 2024. We identified 103 studies reporting EHR data for individuals with ADHD. Among these, 83 studies provided information on the type of prescribed medication. However, dosage, duration of treatment, and ADHD symptom ratings before and after treatment initiation were only reported by a minority of studies. This review supports the potential use of EHRs to develop treatment response prediction models but emphasizes the need for more comprehensive reporting of treatment-related data, such as changes in ADHD symptom ratings and other possible baseline clinical predictors of treatment response.
Baldwin I, Cho A, Orenstein G
… +3 more, Wilner N, Nicoli D, Smith JR
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol
· 2024 Nov · PMID 39235394
·
Full text
Hyperactive catatonia is often unrecognized in pediatric patients due to its clinical heterogeneity, though it is often seen in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, especially autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Em...Hyperactive catatonia is often unrecognized in pediatric patients due to its clinical heterogeneity, though it is often seen in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, especially autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Emerging evidence implicates hyperactive catatonia in more cases of self-injury and aggression in ASD than previously thought. The study seeks to describe cases of hyperactive catatonia in SYNGAP-1 mutation and examine existing literature for symptomatic overlap between previously-described clinical and behavioral phenotypes of individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations and catatonia. The study describes two cases of an adolescent and a young adult with SYNGAP-1 mutation and ASD presenting with hyperactive catatonia, which are the first reports of catatonia in individuals known to have a pathogenic variant in SYNGAP-1. A systematic review was undertaken during which 101 articles were screened. 13 articles were then examined for neurological and behavioral features present in participants with SYNGAP-1 mutations which are seen in catatonia. The systematic review demonstrates that clinical features suggestive of catatonia are frequently seen among individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations, including verbal impairment, psychomotor symptoms, aggression, oral aversion, and incontinence. These features were also present in the cases of catatonia in SYNGAP-1 mutations presented here. Both patients showed clinical improvement with use of a long-acting benzodiazepine, and one patient showed benefit from electroconvulsive therapy. This symptomatic overlap revealed in the systematic review, including symptoms seen in the reported cases, raises the possibility that diagnoses of catatonia may have been missed in the past in individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations. Self-injurious behavior and aggression, which are hallmarks of hyperactive catatonia, are commonly part of the behavioral phenotype of SYNGAP-1-related disorders. Clinicians should consider catatonia as a cause of such symptoms in individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations, as effective treatment can result in significant improvement in safety and quality of life.
Tourette disorder (TD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of tics lasting more than one year, with multiple motor tics and at least one phonic tic at some point during the course of the sym...Tourette disorder (TD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of tics lasting more than one year, with multiple motor tics and at least one phonic tic at some point during the course of the symptoms. Treatment of tics may include psychoeducation, non-pharmacologic treatment, or pharmacologic treatment. We review pharmacologic treatment here. We performed a literature review on pharmacologic treatments for TD. There is no current evidence to suggest that medications impact the prognosis of tic disorders, so current clinical guidelines recommend reassurance of the patient and family and monitoring if there is no change in function or quality of life due to tics. If treatment is indicated, it must be chosen based on the needs of each individual patient. Comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT) is considered first-line management for most individuals with bothersome tics, especially if they are mild to moderate in severity. Pharmacotherapy should be considered when tics are impairing daily functioning, causing social problems, accompanied by other neuropsychiatric symptoms, or when the patient is not likely to benefit from CBIT. Current recommended pharmacotherapy options include alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, dopamine modulators, GABAergic medications, dopamine depleters, and botulinum toxin injections. Additionally, there are other novel medications that are being studied in ongoing clinical trials. This review summarizes available pharmacotherapy options for TD in children. It provides an overview of new medications and offers guidance to physicians when selecting appropriate treatments. If medications are indicated for tic management, treatment should be chosen based on the needs of the individual patient.
There are currently no long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in child and adolescent patients, however these agents are used off-label for the treatme...There are currently no long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in child and adolescent patients, however these agents are used off-label for the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. This study aims to describe the initiation and maintenance dosing strategies of LAIAs in child and adolescent psychiatry inpatients. This was a single-site retrospective chart review of patients less than 18 years of age initiated on an LAIA during an acute psychiatric hospitalization between October 1, 2015, and October 31, 2022. Patient demographics and hospital encounter information were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Of the 6402 unique pediatric patients discharged from the acute psychiatric hospital within the specified timeframe, 45 (0.7%) were newly initiated on an LAIA. The average age was 15.6 years (range 10-17), with a greater proportion of male ( = 26, 57.8%) and Black or African American ( = 27, 60%) patients. The LAIA agents prescribed included paliperidone palmitate ( = 21, 46.7%), aripiprazole monohydrate ( = 15, 33.3%), aripiprazole lauroxil ( = 7, 15.6%), haloperidol decanoate ( = 1, 2.2%), and risperidone microspheres ( = 1, 2.2%). Primary diagnosis via International Classification of Diseases-10 code at discharge included schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders ( = 19, 42.2%); bipolar disorder ( = 14, 31.1%); disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders ( = 6, 13.3%); autistic disorder ( = 5, 11.1%); and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( = 1, 2.2%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) received a loading dose regimen and/or a maintenance dose regimen that differed from adult package-insert dosing. The mean length of stay was 23.7 days, and 14 patients (31.1%) were readmitted to the psychiatric hospital within 6 months of discharge. The mean number of days to readmission was 71.9 days. This retrospective study is the first to focus on LAIA initiation and maintenance dosing strategies of multiple agents in both a child and adolescent patient population. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of LAIAs on clinical outcomes in this patient population.
Professional guidelines recommend that providers routinely monitor children prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) to reduce the risk of adverse metabolic events associated with the medication. Despite this gu...Professional guidelines recommend that providers routinely monitor children prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) to reduce the risk of adverse metabolic events associated with the medication. Despite this guidance, many studies show low rates of monitoring compliance. In this study, we interviewed child psychiatrists for their views of possible barriers to monitoring. Semi-structured qualitative interviews, developed according to the Regehr model of influences upon patient-provider decision making, were conducted with child and adolescent psychiatrists in current practice and recruited by convenience and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted through internet video meetings and were recorded. Interview data were analyzed following Framework Analysis qualitative methods. We recruited and completed interviews with 17 psychiatrists. Patient-level barriers included travel difficulties, limited family time for health care appointments, patient fear of blood draws, and more. Provider-level barriers included professional judgment versus guideline guidance, perceived family burden, assumption of low-risk, short-term SGA use, and more. Organizational level barriers included lack of organizational mandates or incentives, limited appointment time per patient, lack of care coordination, lack of co-located labs, personnel turnover, and more. Barriers at the social and cultural level include stigma and low health literacy. These practicing prescribers provided a wide range of possible barriers to metabolic monitoring in children and adolescents prescribed SGAs. The next step is to explore which may be present in certain settings, and to pilot quality improvement interventions. Addressing barriers can reduce risk of metabolic disorders arising from long-term use of SGAs in children and adolescents.
To compare the proportion of children and adolescents with incident psychotropic medication use from 2019 through 2022. This cross-sectional study used the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics health plan claims databas...To compare the proportion of children and adolescents with incident psychotropic medication use from 2019 through 2022. This cross-sectional study used the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics health plan claims database. Our study sample consisted of children and adolescents ages 6-18 who had at least one psychotropic medication in March 2019-February 2022. We examined psychotropic medication use in three distinct study periods: pre-pandemic (March 2019 to February 2020), pandemic-year-1 (March 2020-February 2021), and pandemic-year-2 (March 2021-February 2022). Incident use was defined as no evidence of psychotropic medication in the 12 months preceding the child and adolescent's first psychotropic dispensing in each study period. We estimated incident psychotropic use in the three study periods. Average marginal effects tested for significant differences in psychotropic initiation, overall and stratified by age and sex. In our sample of 42,346 children and adolescents who were dispensed any psychotropic medication during the study period, incident psychotropic users were 27.8% in pre-pandemic, 26.0% in pandemic-year-1, and 27.8% in pandemic-year-2. Incident use of antidepressants was 51.4% in pandemic-year-1 and 54.6% in pandemic-year-2. The probability of incident psychotropic use was 2.4% lower in pandemic-year-1 than in the pre-pandemic year ( < 0.001). The proportion of 6-11-year-olds and females initiating a psychotropic was higher in pandemic-year-2 than pre-pandemic. Incident psychotropic use was most notable in younger and female children 2 years after the pandemic onset.
Stimulants, such as methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamines, represent the first-line pharmacological option for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated benef...Stimulants, such as methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamines, represent the first-line pharmacological option for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated beneficial effects at a group level but could not identify characteristics consistently associated with varying individual response. Thus, more individualized approaches are needed. Experimental studies have suggested that the neurobiological response to a single dose is indicative of longer term response. It is unclear whether this also applies to clinical measures. We carried out a systematic review of RCTs testing the association between the clinical response to a single dose of stimulants and longer term improvement. Potentially suitable single-dose RCTs were identified from the MED-ADHD data set, the European ADHD Guidelines Group RCT Data set (https://med-adhd.org/), as updated on February 1, 2024. Quality assessment was carried out using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. A total of 63 single-dose RCTs (94% testing MPH, 85% in children) were identified. Among these, only a secondary analysis of an RCT tested the association between acute and longer term clinical response. This showed that the clinical improvement after a single dose of MPH was significantly associated with symptom improvement after a 4-week MPH treatment in 46 children (89% males) with ADHD. The risk of bias was rated as moderate. A further RCT used near-infrared spectroscopy, thus did not meet the inclusion criteria, and reported an association between brain changes under a single-dose and longer term clinical response in 22 children (82% males) with ADHD. The remaining RCTs only reported single-dose effects on neuropsychological, neuroimaging, or neurophysiological measures. This systematic review highlighted an important gap in the current knowledge. Investigating how acute and long-term response may be related can foster our understanding of stimulant mechanism of action and help develop stratification approaches for more tailored treatment strategies. Future studies need to investigate potential age- and sex-related differences.
Patterns of psychotropic medication use in children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) are largely unknown. Clinical decisions are often made from evidence and experience from individuals with autism spectrum disord...Patterns of psychotropic medication use in children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) are largely unknown. Clinical decisions are often made from evidence and experience from individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or intellectual disability (ID). Longitudinal data from 670 children with DS who received care in a specialty DS clinic from March 2021 to February 2024 were collected. After each clinic visit, the clinician indicated the presence or absence of co-occurring neurodevelopmental (ND) or mental health (MH) diagnoses, as well as whether the individual was prescribed a psychopharmacological treatment. We used descriptive statistics and analyzed associations between psychotropic medication use, co-occurring ND/MH conditions, and demographic data. 19.1% of patients were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication at their most recent clinical visit. Alpha-agonists were the most commonly prescribed medication class (30.8%), followed by stimulants (18.9%), and antidepressants (16.7%). There was a significant difference in psychotropic medication use by age, with older children having increased odds of being prescribed a psychotropic medication. There were no differences in psychotropic medication use across sex ( = 0.10), race ( = 0.10), or household income ( = 0.16). We found that one-fifth of patients with DS were prescribed psychotropic medications. Nearly every individual with DS who was prescribed a psychotropic medication had a co-occurring ND/MH condition, yet these rates were lower than what have been reported in children with ID, ASD, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Further research needs to include those with DS to further understand medication efficacy and safe dosing practices to ensure optimal outcomes.
The administration of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements is recommended as an adjuvant therapy for adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder. The evaluation of replicated data in combination treatment w...The administration of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements is recommended as an adjuvant therapy for adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder. The evaluation of replicated data in combination treatment with omega-3 has been extensively conducted in adults over the past decade. However, the generalizability of these findings to pediatric groups is still uncertain. The objectives of this evaluation were twofold: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of omega-3 and associated combination therapies in reducing the severity of depressive symptoms, and (2) to include remission rates (i.e., reduction of more than 50% in depression symptoms) as a measure of therapeutic efficacy. We conducted a literature search on PubMed/EMBASE from inception to October 2023. Data analyses were conducted using Stata (version 17.0). We identified a total of 3168 articles. After eligibility screening of identified studies, nine studies (n = 561 participants) were included in our analysis herein. Pairwise comparisons revealed no significant improvement in depression symptoms for any intervention versus placebo. However, a clustered ranking plot identified omega-3 plus inositol as the most effective treatment for pediatric depression (77.3% efficacy). Omega-3 paired with psychoeducational psychotherapy significantly lowered the remission rate compared to placebo (standardized mean difference = 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.00-0.87, p = 0.048), resulting in a 91.5% remission rate, making it the most effective treatment in the study. Taken together, this network meta-analysis presents compelling evidence supporting the antidepressant effects of omega-3 in pediatric groups with depression. Future research should aim to investigate omega-3 as monotherapy for young individuals with depression, as well as investigate the efficacy of omega-3 in comparison to psychosocial interventions for affected individuals.