F. Pagès, A. Berger, F. Zinzindohoué, A. Kirilovsky, J. Galon, W.-H. Fridman Lymph node dissection is an integral part of the surgical resection of colon cancers; it completes the wide regional resection of tumor and it...F. Pagès, A. Berger, F. Zinzindohoué, A. Kirilovsky, J. Galon, W.-H. Fridman Lymph node dissection is an integral part of the surgical resection of colon cancers; it completes the wide regional resection of tumor and it allows prognostic evaluation through accurate staging. Studies have demonstrated an immune reaction to the tumoral site which attests to an ongoing dialog between the tumor and systemic defenses. The regional lymph nodes constitute an important first line of immune defense where initial host response is initiated or, inversely, they may participate in a local state of immunosuppression. This article reviews current knowledge on intra-tumoral and nodal immune status in colorectal cancers and attempts to evaluate the potential immunologic implications of lymph node dissection.
S. Gouy, C. Uzan, Y. Zafrani, C. Lhommé, P. Pautier, P. Duvillard, C. Haie-Meder, P. Morice Uterine cancer can metastasize to both the pelvic and para-aortic levels. No one questions the diagnostic and prognostic value o...S. Gouy, C. Uzan, Y. Zafrani, C. Lhommé, P. Pautier, P. Duvillard, C. Haie-Meder, P. Morice Uterine cancer can metastasize to both the pelvic and para-aortic levels. No one questions the diagnostic and prognostic value of lymphadenectomy, but its therapeutic value is still open to debate. In early cervical cancer (<4 cm.), pelvic lymphadenectomy is a routine part of radical hysterectomy. If pelvic lymph nodes show involvement, one can propose an extension of the lymphadenectomy to the para-aortic level. Studies of sentinel lymph node identification and biopsy at this level are currently under way. The standard treatment of cervical cancer > 4 cm is radiotherapy. A pre-radiation laparoscopy to investigate lymph node involvement at the lumbo-aortic level may help to define the extent of the radiation field. For endometrial cancer, the role and benefit of lymphadenectomy are much less clear since these patients often have major co-morbidities which increase the risk of complications from an extended lymph node dissection.
D. Salet-Lizée, S. Alsary Ovarian cancer often invades regional lymph nodes but the patterns of involvement are variable; spread to para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes can be unilateral, contralateral or bilateral. For st...D. Salet-Lizée, S. Alsary Ovarian cancer often invades regional lymph nodes but the patterns of involvement are variable; spread to para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes can be unilateral, contralateral or bilateral. For staging purposes, complete lymph node dissection seems more reasonable and effective than simple lymph node sampling. In early stage disease, lymph node dissection has both diagnostic and therapeutic value allowing identification and optimal management of Stage IIIc tumors with retroperitoneal spread; it may also have direct therapeutic value by removing retroperitoneal micrometastatic disease including cell clones which may be resistant to chemotherapy. Therefore, complete lymph node dissection is recommended in early-stage disease with the exception of stage I mucinous ovarian cancer. In advanced-stage disease, lymph node involvement is an additional factor of poor prognosis correlating with increased tumor aggressivity. Optimal debulking resection of all visible tumor offers the best chance for a prolonged disease-free interval if patient condition permits and morbidity can be limited. Survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection has not been evaluated by randomized controlled trials; but several non-randomized studies and two long-term prospective trials have shown objective improvement in disease-free survival and improved quality of life when debulking surgery leaves no residual tumor larger than 1 cm.
F. Leblanc, C. Laurent E. Rullier Lymph node dissection is a standard part of surgical resection of rectal cancer which helps to avoid local recurrence and allows for accurate staging of the disease. Three types of lymph...F. Leblanc, C. Laurent E. Rullier Lymph node dissection is a standard part of surgical resection of rectal cancer which helps to avoid local recurrence and allows for accurate staging of the disease. Three types of lymph node dissection have been considered. Mesorectal lymphadenectomy should remove the mesorectum systematically and should extend at least 5cm distal to the tumor. Inferior mesenteric lymphadenectomy should extend at least to the origin of the left colic artery. Lateral lymphadenectomy removing iliac and obturator nodes results in complications and has not been shown to improve survival; it is not routinely recommended. Omission of lymph node dissection is only proposed for the smallest T1 tumors with favorable histology.
F. Lacaine Lymph node metastasis carries enormous prognostic weight in the evaluation of colon cancer and raises the question of how extensive a lymph node dissection should be. Lymph node dissection has several goals: 1...F. Lacaine Lymph node metastasis carries enormous prognostic weight in the evaluation of colon cancer and raises the question of how extensive a lymph node dissection should be. Lymph node dissection has several goals: 1) staging of the cancer at the time of intervention; 2) improving the chances for complete resection and cure; 3) evaluating the thoroughness and quality of a particular surgical procedure. The prognostic value of lymphadenectomy is evident from the direct practical decisions it entails: evidence-based recommendations (Level A) have proposed adjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with Stage III colon cancer since 1990. Studies have shown a statistically significant correlation between the number of nodes examined in an operative specimen and long-term survival in patients with Stage II disease. The more closely lymph nodes are examined, the more metastasis is found; one can then see the aberrations of stage migration described as the "Will Rogers Phenomenon." Without randomized studies, it is impossible to say whether resection of a larger number of lymph nodes actually improves the prognosis or whether that number is simply a marker of better surgical management including the quality of the surgical gesture, the careful pathologic examination of the specimen, and subsequent choices for adjuvant chemotherapy. The recovery of 12 lymph nodes correlates with a better global prognosis. At the very least, it is an effective marker for the quality of the surgical resection and can be used in the evaluation of professional practice.
A. Sauvanet Several factors argue for extended lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 1) lymph node extension is an adverse prognostic factor; 2) some tumor recurrences are only loco-regional suggestin...A. Sauvanet Several factors argue for extended lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 1) lymph node extension is an adverse prognostic factor; 2) some tumor recurrences are only loco-regional suggesting that initial resection was insufficient; 3) some retrospective studies suggest that extension of lymphadenectomy improves post-resection survival. Extended lymphadenectomy, including circumferential dissection of both the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery and resection of para-aortic nodes, was evaluated by 4 randomized trials; globally there was no survival benefit. Extended lymphadenectomy increases, at least transiently, the risk of post-operative diarrhea. Its influence on the rate of loco-regional recurrences has not been evaluated. However, this technique should not be definitively and globally precluded since a more radical resection was associated with a trend toward better long-term survival in the trial with the largest number of patients.
C. Mariette, G. Piessen, C. Vons Lymph node invasion is the principal prognostic factor in cancers of the stomach and esophagus which have a tendency to early lymphatic spread.The anatomy of regional lymph node groupings...C. Mariette, G. Piessen, C. Vons Lymph node invasion is the principal prognostic factor in cancers of the stomach and esophagus which have a tendency to early lymphatic spread.The anatomy of regional lymph node groupings is described and standard and extended types of lymphadenectomy are defined. We discuss he role of lymph node dissection - particularly extended lymphadenectomy - and assess whether there is demonstrable benefit in terms of morbidity and mortality, loco-regional recurrence, and survival. Articles from the surgical literature with the highest levels of evidence are analyzed. Practical guidelines for treatment choice are proposed.
M. Pocard, J.-C. Sabourin In theory, the concept of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can be applied to cancer surgery for all solid cancers. Yet sentinel lymph node biopsy has not become a standard part of gastrointestin...M. Pocard, J.-C. Sabourin In theory, the concept of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can be applied to cancer surgery for all solid cancers. Yet sentinel lymph node biopsy has not become a standard part of gastrointestinal cancer surgery. It has been of value in the assessment of small early-stage gastric cancers, but has only achieved widespread practice in Japan. Studies of SLN biopsy in colon cancer have not shown it to be a reliable predictor of N+ status and therefore don't permit the omission of lymph node dissection in selected cases. On the other hand, as a form of intra-operative lymph node mapping, dye injection of the SLN may demonstrate aberrant lymphatic drainage and could occasionally permit the sparing of a middle colic artery whose sacrifice would otherwise be dictated by standard drainage patterns. SLN biopsy may have prognostic usefulness by demonstrating micrometastases; careful serial sectioning focussed on the SLN may detect nests of metastatic cells on HE staining, thereby converting a tumor from Stage I (TxN0M0) to Stage II (TxN1M0). This finding has been noted in 10-15% of cases. However, the prognostic value of micrometastases detected only by immunohistochemical staining or PCR has not been demonstrated. For cancers of the anal canal, SLN biopsy of inguinal nodes has been tested as a means of establishing the indications for inguinal lymph node dissection.
L. Brunaud Thyroid cancers are the most common endocrine cancer. Cervical lymph node metastases are observed in 20 to 60% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer. In 2008, no prospective randomized study has defined wh...L. Brunaud Thyroid cancers are the most common endocrine cancer. Cervical lymph node metastases are observed in 20 to 60% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer. In 2008, no prospective randomized study has defined whether prophylactic central neck dissection should be performed during initial surgery for papillary thyroid cancer. Prophylactic lymph node dissection remains controversial. Pros and cons for routine lymph node dissection of the central cervical compartment are discussed in this review of the literature which includes data from international and French consensus conferences.
F. Pagès, A. Berger, F. Zinzindohoué, A. Kirilovsky, J. Galon, W.-H. Fridman Lymph node dissection is an integral part of the surgical resection of colon cancers; it completes the wide regional resection of tumor and it...F. Pagès, A. Berger, F. Zinzindohoué, A. Kirilovsky, J. Galon, W.-H. Fridman Lymph node dissection is an integral part of the surgical resection of colon cancers; it completes the wide regional resection of tumor and it allows prognostic evaluation through accurate staging. Studies have demonstrated an immune reaction to the tumoral site which attests to an ongoing dialog between the tumor and systemic defenses. The regional lymph nodes constitute an important first line of immune defense where initial host response is initiated or, inversely, they may participate in a local state of immunosuppression. This article reviews current knowledge on intra-tumoral and nodal immune status in colorectal cancers and attempts to evaluate the potential immunologic implications of lymph node dissection.
S. Gouy, C. Uzan, Y. Zafrani, C. Lhommé, P. Pautier, P. Duvillard, C. Haie-Meder, P. Morice Uterine cancer can metastasize to both the pelvic and para-aortic levels. No one questions the diagnostic and prognostic value o...S. Gouy, C. Uzan, Y. Zafrani, C. Lhommé, P. Pautier, P. Duvillard, C. Haie-Meder, P. Morice Uterine cancer can metastasize to both the pelvic and para-aortic levels. No one questions the diagnostic and prognostic value of lymphadenectomy, but its therapeutic value is still open to debate. In early cervical cancer (<4 cm.), pelvic lymphadenectomy is a routine part of radical hysterectomy. If pelvic lymph nodes show involvement, one can propose an extension of the lymphadenectomy to the para-aortic level. Studies of sentinel lymph node identification and biopsy at this level are currently under way. The standard treatment of cervical cancer > 4 cm is radiotherapy. A pre-radiation laparoscopy to investigate lymph node involvement at the lumbo-aortic level may help to define the extent of the radiation field. For endometrial cancer, the role and benefit of lymphadenectomy are much less clear since these patients often have major co-morbidities which increase the risk of complications from an extended lymph node dissection.
D. Salet-Lizée, S. Alsary Ovarian cancer often invades regional lymph nodes but the patterns of involvement are variable; spread to para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes can be unilateral, contralateral or bilateral. For st...D. Salet-Lizée, S. Alsary Ovarian cancer often invades regional lymph nodes but the patterns of involvement are variable; spread to para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes can be unilateral, contralateral or bilateral. For staging purposes, complete lymph node dissection seems more reasonable and effective than simple lymph node sampling. In early stage disease, lymph node dissection has both diagnostic and therapeutic value allowing identification and optimal management of Stage IIIc tumors with retroperitoneal spread; it may also have direct therapeutic value by removing retroperitoneal micrometastatic disease including cell clones which may be resistant to chemotherapy. Therefore, complete lymph node dissection is recommended in early-stage disease with the exception of stage I mucinous ovarian cancer. In advanced-stage disease, lymph node involvement is an additional factor of poor prognosis correlating with increased tumor aggressivity. Optimal debulking resection of all visible tumor offers the best chance for a prolonged disease-free interval if patient condition permits and morbidity can be limited. Survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection has not been evaluated by randomized controlled trials; but several non-randomized studies and two long-term prospective trials have shown objective improvement in disease-free survival and improved quality of life when debulking surgery leaves no residual tumor larger than 1 cm.
F. Leblanc, C. Laurent E. Rullier Lymph node dissection is a standard part of surgical resection of rectal cancer which helps to avoid local recurrence and allows for accurate staging of the disease. Three types of lymph...F. Leblanc, C. Laurent E. Rullier Lymph node dissection is a standard part of surgical resection of rectal cancer which helps to avoid local recurrence and allows for accurate staging of the disease. Three types of lymph node dissection have been considered. Mesorectal lymphadenectomy should remove the mesorectum systematically and should extend at least 5cm distal to the tumor. Inferior mesenteric lymphadenectomy should extend at least to the origin of the left colic artery. Lateral lymphadenectomy removing iliac and obturator nodes results in complications and has not been shown to improve survival; it is not routinely recommended. Omission of lymph node dissection is only proposed for the smallest T1 tumors with favorable histology.
F. Lacaine Lymph node metastasis carries enormous prognostic weight in the evaluation of colon cancer and raises the question of how extensive a lymph node dissection should be. Lymph node dissection has several goals: 1...F. Lacaine Lymph node metastasis carries enormous prognostic weight in the evaluation of colon cancer and raises the question of how extensive a lymph node dissection should be. Lymph node dissection has several goals: 1) staging of the cancer at the time of intervention; 2) improving the chances for complete resection and cure; 3) evaluating the thoroughness and quality of a particular surgical procedure. The prognostic value of lymphadenectomy is evident from the direct practical decisions it entails: evidence-based recommendations (Level A) have proposed adjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with Stage III colon cancer since 1990. Studies have shown a statistically significant correlation between the number of nodes examined in an operative specimen and long-term survival in patients with Stage II disease. The more closely lymph nodes are examined, the more metastasis is found; one can then see the aberrations of stage migration described as the "Will Rogers Phenomenon." Without randomized studies, it is impossible to say whether resection of a larger number of lymph nodes actually improves the prognosis or whether that number is simply a marker of better surgical management including the quality of the surgical gesture, the careful pathologic examination of the specimen, and subsequent choices for adjuvant chemotherapy. The recovery of 12 lymph nodes correlates with a better global prognosis. At the very least, it is an effective marker for the quality of the surgical resection and can be used in the evaluation of professional practice.
A. Sauvanet Several factors argue for extended lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 1) lymph node extension is an adverse prognostic factor; 2) some tumor recurrences are only loco-regional suggestin...A. Sauvanet Several factors argue for extended lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 1) lymph node extension is an adverse prognostic factor; 2) some tumor recurrences are only loco-regional suggesting that initial resection was insufficient; 3) some retrospective studies suggest that extension of lymphadenectomy improves post-resection survival. Extended lymphadenectomy, including circumferential dissection of both the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery and resection of para-aortic nodes, was evaluated by 4 randomized trials; globally there was no survival benefit. Extended lymphadenectomy increases, at least transiently, the risk of post-operative diarrhea. Its influence on the rate of loco-regional recurrences has not been evaluated. However, this technique should not be definitively and globally precluded since a more radical resection was associated with a trend toward better long-term survival in the trial with the largest number of patients.
C. Mariette, G. Piessen, C. Vons Lymph node invasion is the principal prognostic factor in cancers of the stomach and esophagus which have a tendency to early lymphatic spread.The anatomy of regional lymph node groupings...C. Mariette, G. Piessen, C. Vons Lymph node invasion is the principal prognostic factor in cancers of the stomach and esophagus which have a tendency to early lymphatic spread.The anatomy of regional lymph node groupings is described and standard and extended types of lymphadenectomy are defined. We discuss he role of lymph node dissection - particularly extended lymphadenectomy - and assess whether there is demonstrable benefit in terms of morbidity and mortality, loco-regional recurrence, and survival. Articles from the surgical literature with the highest levels of evidence are analyzed. Practical guidelines for treatment choice are proposed.
M. Pocard, J.-C. Sabourin In theory, the concept of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can be applied to cancer surgery for all solid cancers. Yet sentinel lymph node biopsy has not become a standard part of gastrointestin...M. Pocard, J.-C. Sabourin In theory, the concept of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can be applied to cancer surgery for all solid cancers. Yet sentinel lymph node biopsy has not become a standard part of gastrointestinal cancer surgery. It has been of value in the assessment of small early-stage gastric cancers, but has only achieved widespread practice in Japan. Studies of SLN biopsy in colon cancer have not shown it to be a reliable predictor of N+ status and therefore don't permit the omission of lymph node dissection in selected cases. On the other hand, as a form of intra-operative lymph node mapping, dye injection of the SLN may demonstrate aberrant lymphatic drainage and could occasionally permit the sparing of a middle colic artery whose sacrifice would otherwise be dictated by standard drainage patterns. SLN biopsy may have prognostic usefulness by demonstrating micrometastases; careful serial sectioning focussed on the SLN may detect nests of metastatic cells on HE staining, thereby converting a tumor from Stage I (TxN0M0) to Stage II (TxN1M0). This finding has been noted in 10-15% of cases. However, the prognostic value of micrometastases detected only by immunohistochemical staining or PCR has not been demonstrated. For cancers of the anal canal, SLN biopsy of inguinal nodes has been tested as a means of establishing the indications for inguinal lymph node dissection.
L. Brunaud Thyroid cancers are the most common endocrine cancer. Cervical lymph node metastases are observed in 20 to 60% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer. In 2008, no prospective randomized study has defined wh...L. Brunaud Thyroid cancers are the most common endocrine cancer. Cervical lymph node metastases are observed in 20 to 60% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer. In 2008, no prospective randomized study has defined whether prophylactic central neck dissection should be performed during initial surgery for papillary thyroid cancer. Prophylactic lymph node dissection remains controversial. Pros and cons for routine lymph node dissection of the central cervical compartment are discussed in this review of the literature which includes data from international and French consensus conferences.