Doos D, Hughes AM, Pham T
… +6 more, Barach P, Bona A, Falvo L, Moore M, Cooper DD, Ahmed R
Am J Med Qual
· 2024 Jan-Feb 01 · PMID 38127677
·
Publisher ↗
Infectious risks escalate with complex donning and doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols. Recent studies suggest that PPE donning and doffing behaviors that deviate from protocol during PPE reuse compound...Infectious risks escalate with complex donning and doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols. Recent studies suggest that PPE donning and doffing behaviors that deviate from protocol during PPE reuse compounded the risks of health care worker (HCW) self-contamination. This study quantified the occurrence of behaviors associated with known risks in PPE use and reuse. We conducted a prospective study of emergency department HCWs and video-recorded PPE donning and doffing 5 times in simulated patient encounters. Trained coders recorded HCW behaviors according to an evidence-based guide. All 28 participants deviated from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sanctioned donning and doffing protocol order, and most were documented to have (92.85%) self-contaminated at least once during each simulated clinical encounter. Behaviors that compounded self-contamination due to PPE reuse were also observed. Wide variation in PPE donning and doffing behaviors was found among front-line, experienced HCWs. Future work is needed to determine which deviations put HCWs at increased risk for accidental self-contamination and what changes are needed to the CDC protocol for protecting HCW from infections.
Richards J, Brunacini K, Stoll N
… +1 more, Tepper R
Am J Med Qual
· 2024 Jan-Feb 01 · PMID 38127676
·
Publisher ↗
Vaccines are among the most cost-effective and successful medical interventions, saving approximately 2.3 million lives annually. Unfortunately, vaccination coverage for adults remains low, leading to unnecessary and cos...Vaccines are among the most cost-effective and successful medical interventions, saving approximately 2.3 million lives annually. Unfortunately, vaccination coverage for adults remains low, leading to unnecessary and costly health consequences. An initial chart review revealed that 95% (N = 20) of students were not up to date with vaccines. In a patient survey, 100% of students (N = 21) did not recall receiving useful vaccine information, but 66.7% reported it would be helpful (≥4 of 5 on the Likert scale). Strategies supporting effective care, an Institute of Medicine quality domain, were used to address these gaps. The aim was to increase effective care in university adult students for vaccines by 30% over 90 days. The quality improvement method of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles was used to evaluate iterative tests of change. Examining contextual elements, team and patient feedback, aggregate data, and run charts informed tests of change over 4 cycles. Core interventions included enhanced screening, vaccine shared decision-making, provider checklists, and a team engagement plan. Greater than 83% (N = 152) of students were not up to date with vaccines as per national guidelines. Over 8 weeks, the team effectively referred students for 265 of the 274 vaccines they were eligible for-an accuracy rate of 95.3%. The aim score, a mean composite score reflecting all 3 interventions, increased from 49% to 95%. Effective care for vaccine uptake increased by 83.8%-far exceeding the goal. Campus health centers and other primary care settings could benefit from adopting a similar strategy that provides clear benefits to patients and the broader community while decreasing health care costs.
Rosenbluth G, Choi LW, Boscardin CK
… +6 more, Gonzales R, Green A, Hernandez A, Vidyarthi AR, Julian KA, Baron RB
Am J Med Qual
· 2024 Jan-Feb 01 · PMID 38127672
·
Publisher ↗
Alignment between graduate medical education (GME) and health system priorities is foundational to meaningful engagement of residents and fellows in systems improvement work within the clinical learning environment. The...Alignment between graduate medical education (GME) and health system priorities is foundational to meaningful engagement of residents and fellows in systems improvement work within the clinical learning environment. The Residents and Fellows Leading Interprofessional Continuous Improvement Teams program at the University of California San Francisco was designed over a decade ago to address barriers to trainee participation in health system-based improvement work. The program provides structure and support for health system-aligned trainee-led improvement projects in the clinic learning environment. Project champions (residents/fellows) from GME programs attend workshops where they learn improvement methodologies and develop proposals for health system-based improvement projects for their training programs. Proposals are supported by local faculty mentors and are reviewed and approved by GME and health systems' leaders. During the academic year, teams share their progress using visual management boards and interactive leader rounds. The health system provides a modest financial incentive for successful projects. Since the program's inception, thousands of trainees from 58 residency and fellowship programs have participated either as champions or participants in the program at least once, and in total over 300 projects have been implemented. Approximately three-quarters of the specific improvement goals were met, all projects meaningfully engaged residents and fellows, and many projects continued after the learners graduated. This active partnership between GME and a health system created a symbiotic relationship; trainees received education and support to complete improvement projects, while the health system reaped additional benefits from the alignment and impact of the projects. This partnership continues to grow with steady increases in participating programs, spread to partner health systems, and scholarship for trainees and faculty.
Leung CK, Walton NC, Kheder E
… +8 more, Zalpour A, Wang J, Zavgorodnyaya D, Kondody S, Zhao C, Lin H, Bruera E, Manzano JM
Am J Med Qual
· 2024 Jan-Feb 01 · PMID 38127668
·
Full text
This study aimed to describe the potentially preventable 7-day unplanned readmission (PPR) rate in medical oncology patients. A retrospective analysis of all unplanned 7-day readmissions within Hospital Medicine at MD An...This study aimed to describe the potentially preventable 7-day unplanned readmission (PPR) rate in medical oncology patients. A retrospective analysis of all unplanned 7-day readmissions within Hospital Medicine at MD Anderson Cancer Center from September 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021, was performed. Readmissions were independently analyzed by 2 randomly selected individuals to determine preventability. Discordant reviews were resolved by a third reviewer to reach a consensus. Statistical analysis included 138 unplanned readmissions. The estimated PPR rate was 15.94%. The median age was 62.50 years; 52.90% were female. The most common type of cancer was noncolon GI malignancy (34.06%). Most patients had stage 4 cancer (69.57%) and were discharged home (64.93%). Premature discharge followed by missed opportunities for goals of care discussions were the most cited reasons for potential preventability. These findings highlight areas where care delivery can be improved to mitigate the risk of readmission within the medical oncology population.
Brush PL, Tomlak A, Pohl N
… +15 more, Lee Y, Narayanan R, Meade MH, Lambrechts MJ, Lawall CL, Weber J, Syal A, O'Connor P, Canseco JA, Kaye ID, Kurd MF, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Hilibrand AS, Schroeder GD
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37908033
·
Publisher ↗
Access to specialty and private practice providers has been a divisive policy issue over the last decade, complicated by the conflict between a reduction in government-funded health care reimbursement and the need for he...Access to specialty and private practice providers has been a divisive policy issue over the last decade, complicated by the conflict between a reduction in government-funded health care reimbursement and the need for health care providers to sustain a financially sound practice. This study evaluates the orthopedic spine consult service at an academic tertiary care center at 2 separate time points over a 5-year period to better understand the impact of decreasing orthopedic reimbursement rates and the increasing prevalence of federally supported medical insurance on the access to specialty care. In total 500 patients in 2017 and 480 patients in 2021 were included for the final analysis. A higher percentage of consults in 2021 came from the emergency department (74.0% versus 60.4%, P < 0.001); however, the emergency department saw fewer spinal cord injuries (11.9% versus 21.4%, P < 0.001), and the spinal cord injuries were less severe (3.1% versus 6.2% Association Impairment Scale A or B, P = 0.034). A smaller percentage of patients in 2021 went on to receive orthopedic spine surgery following consultation (35.2% versus 43.8%, P = 0.007), and those receiving surgery had an operation performed farther out from the initial consultation (4.73 versus 4.09 days, P < 0.001). Additionally, fewer patients with Medicare insurance (23.5% versus 30.8%) and more patients with Medicaid insurance (20.2% versus 12.4%) were seen in 2021 compared with 2017 (P = 0.003). Overall, this study found an increased proportion of Medicaid patients seen by the spine consult service but a decrease in the acuity of consults. Measures to improve access to health insurance under the Affordable Care Act have revealed the complexity of this issue in health care. This study's findings have demonstrated that while more patients did have insurance coverage following the Affordable Care Act, they still face a barrier to accessing outpatient orthopedic spine providers.
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37908032
·
Publisher ↗
Oncology patients presenting for outpatient evaluation of a respiratory tract infection (RTI) are often tested for a variety of viruses with a respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) in addition to influenza and SARS-CoV-2. Thi...Oncology patients presenting for outpatient evaluation of a respiratory tract infection (RTI) are often tested for a variety of viruses with a respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) in addition to influenza and SARS-CoV-2. This triad of testing is expensive and uncomfortable because it requires 2 nasal swabs. Little evidence supports the use of an RPP in outpatient settings, but it is routinely ordered. This retrospective chart review analyzed 183 RPPs performed at Jefferson between April 2020 and November 2021 in outpatient oncology patients presenting with RTI. Data collected included patient demographics, symptoms, and exam findings at time of RPP, additional testing completed, results of RPP, antibiotic and antiviral use before and after RPP results, and patient outcomes 30 days after RPP. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Of the 183 RPPs analyzed, 16.9% (31) were positive for at least 1 respiratory virus. Fifty-two patients (28.4%) started antibiotics before results of the RPP. Of those, 2 patients (3.8%) had a change in antibiotic plan after RPP results returned. Zero patients were started on antiviral medication before results of the RPP. One patient started antiviral treatment after RPP results returned. In total, only 3 patients (1.6%) had an RPP-driven change in medication management. This study suggests limited utility in use of RPPs for oncology patients presenting to the office with RTI symptoms. Targeted testing with a single nasal swab for influenza, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2 may be more clinically relevant. The authors hope to use these data to implement a quality improvement initiative to reduce RPP utilization in this population.
Peterson KJ, O'Donnell CM, Eastwood DC
… +5 more, Szabo A, Hu KY, Ridolfi TJ, Ludwig KA, Peterson CY
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37908031
·
Publisher ↗
The Rothman Index (RI) is a real-time health indicator score that has been used to quantify readmission risk in several fields but has never been studied in gastrointestinal surgery. In this retrospective single-institut...The Rothman Index (RI) is a real-time health indicator score that has been used to quantify readmission risk in several fields but has never been studied in gastrointestinal surgery. In this retrospective single-institution study, the association between RI scores and readmissions after unplanned colectomy or proctectomy was evaluated in 427 inpatients. Patient demographics and perioperative measures, including last RI, lowest RI, and increasing/decreasing RI score, were collected. In the selected cohort, 12.4% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of their initial discharge. Last RI, lowest RI, decreasing RI, and increasing RI scores remained significant after controlling for covariates in separate multivariate regression analyses. The last RI score at the time of discharge was found to be the most strongly associated with 30-day readmission risk following colorectal resection. These findings support the RI as a potential tool in the inpatient management of postoperative patients to identify those at high risk of readmission.
Cagle WE, Bagwell KB, Poisson MO
… +2 more, Petro AM, Verdone K
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37908030
·
Publisher ↗
The objective of this project was to improve communication, patient throughput, and rounding efficiency. Primary outcome studied was transfer/discharge order entry time and secondary outcomes included medication order en...The objective of this project was to improve communication, patient throughput, and rounding efficiency. Primary outcome studied was transfer/discharge order entry time and secondary outcomes included medication order entry time, staff perception, and time spent per patient. The location was a level one pediatric intensive care unit in an academic children's hospital. Utilizing Lean Six methodologies the major contributor to increased variability was different attending physician rounding patterns. These patterns were evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee, and the most efficient was adopted by all attending physicians during the study period. Data was collected by secret observers and a pre-post staff perception survey. Transfer/discharge order entry improved by 45 minutes/patient. Medication order entry improved by 89 minutes/order. Staff survey showed increased satisfaction in 9 of 12 aspects. Time spent per patient increased by 20%. In conclusion, standardization of rounds improved patient throughput, medication order entry, and staff satisfaction while increasing value-added time during rounds.
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37908029
·
Publisher ↗
BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending continues to be an area of improvement across all forms of medicine. Overtreatment or low-value care, including overutilization of laboratory testing, has an estimated annual cost of waste...BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending continues to be an area of improvement across all forms of medicine. Overtreatment or low-value care, including overutilization of laboratory testing, has an estimated annual cost of waste of $75.7-$101.2 billion annually. Providing performance feedback to hospitalists has been shown to be an effective way to encourage the practice of quality-improvement-focused medicine. There remains limited data regarding the implementation of performance feedback and direct results on hospital laboratory testing spending in the short term. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this project was to identify whether performance-based feedback on laboratory utilization between both hospitalists and resident teams results in more conservative utilization of laboratory testing. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center, including both direct-care and house-staff teams. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: A weekly performance feedback report was generated and distributed to providers detailing laboratory test utilization by all hospitalists in a ranked system, normalized by the census of patients, for 3 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome measure was cumulative laboratory utilization during the intervention period compared to baseline utilization during the corresponding 3 months in the year prior and the weekly trend in laboratory utilization over 52 weeks. The aggregate laboratory utilization rate during intervention and control time periods was defined as the total number of laboratory tests ordered divided by the total number of patient encounters. Additionally, the cost difference was averaged per quarter and reported. The week-by-week trend in laboratory utilization was evaluated using a statistical process control (SPC) chart. RESULTS: We found that following intervention during January-March 2020, the cumulative complete blood count utilization rate decreased from 5.54 to 4.83 per patient encounter and the basic metabolic panels/CMP utilization rate decreased from 6.65 to 6.11 per patient encounter compared with January-March 2019. This equated to cost savings of ~$42,700 in total for the quarter. Nonrandom variation was seen on SPC charts in weekly laboratory utilization rates for common laboratory tests during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: We found that our intervention did result in a decrease in laboratory test utilization rates across direct-care and house-staff teams. This study lays promising groundwork for one tool that can be used to eliminate a source of hospital waste and improve the quality and efficiency of patient care.
Ruiz Colón G, Evans K, Kanzawa M
… +3 more, Phadke A, Katznelson L, Shieh L
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37882817
·
Full text
Medical trainees have limited knowledge of quality improvement and patient safety concepts. The authors developed a free quality improvement/patient safety educational game entitled Safety Quest (SQ). However, 1803 under...Medical trainees have limited knowledge of quality improvement and patient safety concepts. The authors developed a free quality improvement/patient safety educational game entitled Safety Quest (SQ). However, 1803 undergraduate medical trainees, graduate medical trainees, and continuing medical education learners globally completed at least 1 level of SQ. Pre- and post-SQ knowledge and satisfaction were assessed among continuing medical education learners. Thematic analysis of feedback given by trainees was conducted. Among graduate medical trainees, SQ outranked other learning modalities. Three content areas emerged from feedback: engagement, ease of use, and effectiveness; 87% of comments addressing engagement were positive. After completing SQ, 98.6% of learners passed the post-test, versus 59.2% for the pretest ( P < 0.0001). Ninety-three percent of learners agreed that SQ was engaging and interactive, and 92% believed it contributed to their professional growth. With an increased need for educational curricula to be delivered virtually, gamification emerges as a unique strategy that learners praise as engaging and effective.
Biswas R, Kirti R, Ojha VS
… +2 more, Jaiswal Y, Kaur G
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Sep-Oct 01 · PMID 37678303
·
Publisher ↗
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the World Health Organization (WHO) multimodal hand hygiene improvement (WHO-5) strategy in enhancing hand hygiene compliance among health care workers at a tertiary care hospi...The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the World Health Organization (WHO) multimodal hand hygiene improvement (WHO-5) strategy in enhancing hand hygiene compliance among health care workers at a tertiary care hospital. The interrupted time series study included preintervention, intervention, and postintervention phases, with 2 points of observation each during the pre- and postintervention phases. The baseline hand hygiene compliance was 16%, which improved to 43.9% after the intervention. Health care workers were 4 times more likely to adhere to proper hand hygiene postintervention (odds ratio [OR], 4.117). Independent predictors of hand hygiene compliance included the week of observation (week 3: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.872; week 5: AOR, 3.427; and week 7: AOR, 4.713), health care worker type (consultants: AOR, 0.964; residents: AOR, 2.187; and interns: AOR, 6.684), daytime (AOR, 1.232), and "after" type of hand hygiene opportunity (AOR, 1.577). No significant differences were found in knowledge, attitude, and practices pre- and postintervention, and the interventions' effect was sustained and increased over time, supporting implementation in hospitals across India.
Ladell MM, Shafer G, Ziniel SI
… +1 more, Grubenhoff JA
Am J Med Qual
· 2023 Sep-Oct 01 · PMID 37678302
·
Full text
Diagnostic error remains understudied and underaddressed despite causing significant morbidity and mortality. One barrier to addressing this issue remains provider discomfort. Survey studies have shown significantly more...Diagnostic error remains understudied and underaddressed despite causing significant morbidity and mortality. One barrier to addressing this issue remains provider discomfort. Survey studies have shown significantly more discomfort among providers in discussing diagnostic error compared with other forms of error. Whether the comfort in discussing diagnostic error differs depending on practice setting has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to assess differences in provider willingness to discuss diagnostic error in the inpatient versus outpatient setting. A multicenter survey was sent out to 3881 providers between May and June 2018. This survey was designed to assess comfort level of discussing diagnostic error and looking at barriers to discussing diagnostic error. Forty-three percent versus 22% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.004) were comfortable discussing short-term diagnostic error publicly. Similarly, 76% versus 60% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.010) were comfortable discussing short-term diagnostic error privately. A higher percentage of inpatient (64%) compared with outpatient providers (46%) (P = 0.043) were comfortable discussing long-term diagnostic error privately. Forty percent versus 24% of inpatient versus outpatient providers (P = 0.018) were comfortable discussing long-term error publicly. No difference in barriers cited depending on practice setting. Inpatient providers are more comfortable discussing diagnostic error than their outpatient counterparts. More study is needed to determine the etiology of this discrepancy and to develop strategies to increase outpatient provider comfort.