The current WHO classification for tumors of soft tissue and bone includes numerous new entities, most often defined by novel molecular findings. In this article, we present translocation-positive tumors to broaden the s...The current WHO classification for tumors of soft tissue and bone includes numerous new entities, most often defined by novel molecular findings. In this article, we present translocation-positive tumors to broaden the spectrum of monomorphic mesenchymal neoplasias. The undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas are now assembled in their own separate chapter to underline their occurrence in both soft tissue and bone, emphasizing their morphologic, molecular, and biologic differences. Another interesting new group are tumors with GLI1 activation, which, however, have not yet been included into the WHO classification. NTRK-driven tumors present with a potential therapeutic target for several established inhibitors. Finally, there have been novel findings in rhabdomyosarcomas allowing more precise subtyping associated with different biological behavior.
The development of the WHO classification of tumors of the breast is driven by new knowledge from research whose translation into daily practice is considered clinically relevant. The fifth edition represents an update o...The development of the WHO classification of tumors of the breast is driven by new knowledge from research whose translation into daily practice is considered clinically relevant. The fifth edition represents an update of the fourth edition and essentially follows the previously known systematics. The histologic features of the lesions continue to form the basis of the classification in the update. This also applies to the definition of invasive tumor types. However, several new molecular classifications as well as additional prognostic and predictive factors are presented and discussed, which improve prognosis estimation and therapy decisions. This paper aims to present the main changes in the current WHO classification. These include the revised definition of mixed invasive carcinomas, the introduction of new special invasive entities (tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma), the deletion of special invasive types and their classification as variants of invasive carcinoma, NST (no special type, including medullary, lipid-rich, glycogen-rich, among others), the typing of primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast by analogy with other organ systems, changes in the dignity criteria of phyllodes tumors, and the revised subtyping of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). In addition to improvements in the fifth edition of the classification, flaws are also highlighted. A section is devoted to new molecular parameters.
The new WHO classification of tumors of the female genitalia entails some changes, especially those of prognostic and therapeutic relevance: there is a return to the term borderline tumor. Implants are again subdivided i...The new WHO classification of tumors of the female genitalia entails some changes, especially those of prognostic and therapeutic relevance: there is a return to the term borderline tumor. Implants are again subdivided into noninvasive implants of the epithelial or desmoplastic type as before. Invasive extraovarian implants are classified as low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Former seromucinous carcinomas are now classified as endometrioid carcinomas (seromucinous subtype). New entities of ovarian carcinomas are mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinoma, and mixed carcinoma. The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms is analogous to that of pulmonary and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms, regardless of their location. Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma can be classified into four molecular subtypes, which have significant prognostic significance. New subtypes include mucinous carcinoma of the intestinal type and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. Stromasarcomas of the endometrium are further subclassified based on specific molecular alterations. Adenocarcinomas (ACs) and squamous cell carcinomas (PECs) of the lower female genital tract are distinguished from HPV-associated and HPV-independent carcinomas. Block-like staining for p16 is the accepted surrogate immunohistochemical marker. Grading has not been reported for PEC. For HPV-associated AC of the cervix uteri, prognostic assessment is based on the pattern of invasion (so-called Silva pattern). Serous carcinomas in the cervix uteri are endometrial carcinomas with cervical infiltration.
BACKGROUND: Analyses for the presence of SARS-CoV‑2 in the tissues of COVID-19 patients is important in order to improve our understanding of the disease pathophysiology for interpretation of diagnostic histopathological...BACKGROUND: Analyses for the presence of SARS-CoV‑2 in the tissues of COVID-19 patients is important in order to improve our understanding of the disease pathophysiology for interpretation of diagnostic histopathological findings in autopsies, biopsies, or surgical specimens and to assess the potential for occupational infectious hazard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this review we identified 136 published studies in PubMed's curated literature database LitCovid on SARS-CoV‑2 detection methods in tissues and evaluated them regarding sources of error, specificity, and sensitivity of the methods, taking into account our own experience. RESULTS: Currently, no sufficiently specific histomorphological alterations or diagnostic features for COVID-19 are known. Therefore, three approaches for SARS-CoV‑2 detection are used: RNA, proteins/antigens, or morphological detection by electron microscopy. In the preanalytical phase, the dominant source of error is tissue quality, especially the different intervals between sample collection and processing or fixation (and its duration) and specifically the interval between death and sample collection in autopsies. However, this information is found in less than half of the studies (e.g., in only 42% of autopsy studies). Our own experience and first studies prove the significantly higher sensitivity and specificity of RNA-based detection methods compared to antigen or protein detection by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. Detection by electron microscopy is time consuming and difficult to interpret. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods are available for the detection of SARS-CoV‑2 in tissue. Currently, RNA detection by RT-PCR is the method of choice. However, extensive validation studies and method harmonization are not available and are absolutely necessary.
BACKGROUND: Autopsy is an important tool for understanding the pathogenesis of diseases, including COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On 15 April 2020, together with the German Society of Pathology and the Federal Associati...BACKGROUND: Autopsy is an important tool for understanding the pathogenesis of diseases, including COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On 15 April 2020, together with the German Society of Pathology and the Federal Association of German Pathologists, the German Registry of COVID-19 Autopsies (DeRegCOVID) was launched ( www.DeRegCOVID.ukaachen.de ). Building on this, the German Network for Autopsies in Pandemics (DEFEAT PANDEMIcs) was established on 1 September 2020. RESULTS: The main goal of DeRegCOVID is to collect and distribute de facto anonymized data on potentially all autopsies of people who have died from COVID-19 in Germany in order to meet the need for centralized, coordinated, and structured data collection and reporting during the pandemic. The success of the registry strongly depends on the willingness of the respective centers to report the data, which has developed very positively so far and requires special thanks to all participating centers. The rights to own data and biomaterials (stored decentrally) remain with each respective center. The DEFEAT PANDEMIcs network expands on this and aims to strengthen harmonization and standardization as well as nationwide implementation and cooperation in the field of pandemic autopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The extraordinary cooperation in the field of autopsies in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic is impressively demonstrated by the establishment of DeRegCOVID, the merger of the registry of neuropathology (CNS-COVID19) with DeRegCOVID and the establishment of the autopsy network DEFEAT PANDEMIcs. It gives a strong signal for the necessity, readiness, and expertise to jointly help manage current and future pandemics by autopsy-derived knowledge.
Ritschel N, Radbruch H, Herden C
… +17 more, Schneider N, Dittmayer C, Franz J, Thomas C, Silva Boos G, Pagenstecher A, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Stadelmann C, Glatzel M, Heppner FL, Weis J, Sohrabi K, Schänzer A, Németh A, Acker T, DGNN-Taskforce „CNS-COVID19“, „DEFEAT PANDEMIcs – Neuropathologische Referenzdiagnostik bei COVID-19“
The health effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the infection of SARS-CoV‑2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) are becoming increasingly clear as the pandemic spreads. In addition to th...The health effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the infection of SARS-CoV‑2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) are becoming increasingly clear as the pandemic spreads. In addition to the lungs, other organs are also affected, which can significantly influence morbidity and mortality. In particular, neurological symptoms involving the central nervous system can lead to acute or long-term consequences. The mechanisms of this neuropathogenesis of SARS-CoV‑2 infection and its relation to acute and chronic neurological symptoms are the subject of current studies investigating a potential direct and indirect viral infection of the nervous system. The following review summarizes the current status of neuropathological manifestations, molecular pathogenesis, possible infection pathways in the nervous system, and systemic effects. In addition, an overview of the Germany-wide CNS-COVID19 registry and collaborations is presented, which should contribute to a better understanding of the neurological symptoms of COVID-19.
Apart from pulmonary disease, acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent and most severe organ complications in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The SARS-CoV‑2 virus has been detected in renal tissu...Apart from pulmonary disease, acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent and most severe organ complications in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The SARS-CoV‑2 virus has been detected in renal tissue. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before and on dialysis and specifically renal transplant patients represent a particularly vulnerable population. The increasing number of COVID-19 infected patients with renal involvement led to an evolving interest in the analysis of its pathophysiology, morphology and modes of virus detection in the kidney. Meanwhile, there are ample data from several autopsy and kidney biopsy studies that differ in the quantity of cases as well as in their quality. While the detection of SARS-CoV‑2 RNA in the kidney leads to reproducible results, the use of electron microscopy for visualisation of the virus is difficult and currently critically discussed due to various artefacts. The exact contribution of indirect or direct effects on the kidney in COVID-19 are not yet known and are currently the focus of intensive research.
The worldwide novel coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic is ongoing. SARS-CoV‑2 belongs to the coronavirus family, the first representatives of which have been known since the 1960s. Coronaviruses are present in animals and h...The worldwide novel coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic is ongoing. SARS-CoV‑2 belongs to the coronavirus family, the first representatives of which have been known since the 1960s. Coronaviruses are present in animals and humans and show similarities as well as differences in their biology and pathology regarding each genus. Besides mild flu-like and gastroenterological symptoms, SARS-CoV‑2 can lead to dysfunctions of the lungs and other organs including the heart as already observed during SARS and MERS infections.
BACKGROUND: Analyses for the presence of SARS-CoV‑2 in the tissues of COVID-19 patients is important in order to improve our understanding of the disease pathophysiology for interpretation of diagnostic histopathological...BACKGROUND: Analyses for the presence of SARS-CoV‑2 in the tissues of COVID-19 patients is important in order to improve our understanding of the disease pathophysiology for interpretation of diagnostic histopathological findings in autopsies, biopsies, or surgical specimens and to assess the potential for occupational infectious hazard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this review we identified 136 published studies in PubMed's curated literature database LitCovid on SARS-CoV‑2 detection methods in tissues and evaluated them regarding sources of error, specificity, and sensitivity of the methods, taking into account our own experience. RESULTS: Currently, no sufficiently specific histomorphological alterations or diagnostic features for COVID-19 are known. Therefore, three approaches for SARS-CoV‑2 detection are used: RNA, proteins/antigens, or morphological detection by electron microscopy. In the preanalytical phase, the dominant source of error is tissue quality, especially the different intervals between sample collection and processing or fixation (and its duration) and specifically the interval between death and sample collection in autopsies. However, this information is found in less than half of the studies (e.g., in only 42% of autopsy studies). Our own experience and first studies prove the significantly higher sensitivity and specificity of RNA-based detection methods compared to antigen or protein detection by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. Detection by electron microscopy is time consuming and difficult to interpret. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods are available for the detection of SARS-CoV‑2 in tissue. Currently, RNA detection by RT-PCR is the method of choice. However, extensive validation studies and method harmonization are not available and are absolutely necessary.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic represents a so far unknown challenge for the medical community. Autopsies are important for studying this disease, but their safety was challenged at the beginning of the pandemic. OBJE...BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic represents a so far unknown challenge for the medical community. Autopsies are important for studying this disease, but their safety was challenged at the beginning of the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether COVID-19 autopsies can be performed under existing legal conditions and which safety standards are required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The autopsy procedure undertaken in five institutions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland is detailed with respect to legal and safety standards. RESULTS: In all institutions the autopsies were performed in technically feasible rooms. The personal equipment consisted of functional clothing including a disposable gown and apron, a surgical cap, eye protection, FFP‑3 masks, and two pairs of gloves. In four institutions, complete autopsies were performed; in one institution the ultrasound-guided biopsy within the postmortal imaging and biopsy program. The latter does not allow the appreciation of gross organ pathology; however, it is able to retrieve standardized biopsies for diagnostic and research purposes. Several scientific articles in highly ranked journals resulted from these autopsies and allowed deep insights into organ damage and conclusions to better understand the pathomechanisms. Viral RNA was frequently detectable in the COVID-19 deceased, but the issue of infectivity remains unresolved and it is questionable if Ct values are greater than 30. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate safeguards, autopsies of people who have died from COVID-19 can be performed safely and are highly relevant to medical research.
BACKGROUND: Autopsy is an important tool for understanding the pathogenesis of diseases, including COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On 15 April 2020, together with the German Society of Pathology and the Federal Associati...BACKGROUND: Autopsy is an important tool for understanding the pathogenesis of diseases, including COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On 15 April 2020, together with the German Society of Pathology and the Federal Association of German Pathologists, the German Registry of COVID-19 Autopsies (DeRegCOVID) was launched ( www.DeRegCOVID.ukaachen.de ). Building on this, the German Network for Autopsies in Pandemics (DEFEAT PANDEMIcs) was established on 1 September 2020. RESULTS: The main goal of DeRegCOVID is to collect and distribute de facto anonymized data on potentially all autopsies of people who have died from COVID-19 in Germany in order to meet the need for centralized, coordinated, and structured data collection and reporting during the pandemic. The success of the registry strongly depends on the willingness of the respective centers to report the data, which has developed very positively so far and requires special thanks to all participating centers. The rights to own data and biomaterials (stored decentrally) remain with each respective center. The DEFEAT PANDEMIcs network expands on this and aims to strengthen harmonization and standardization as well as nationwide implementation and cooperation in the field of pandemic autopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The extraordinary cooperation in the field of autopsies in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic is impressively demonstrated by the establishment of DeRegCOVID, the merger of the registry of neuropathology (CNS-COVID19) with DeRegCOVID and the establishment of the autopsy network DEFEAT PANDEMIcs. It gives a strong signal for the necessity, readiness, and expertise to jointly help manage current and future pandemics by autopsy-derived knowledge.
Malignant lymphomas are derived from a common progenitor cell with a unique rearrangement of immunoglobulin or T‑cell receptor genes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analyses allow detection of the clone and are an...Malignant lymphomas are derived from a common progenitor cell with a unique rearrangement of immunoglobulin or T‑cell receptor genes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analyses allow detection of the clone and are an important adjunct for the diagnosis of difficult lymphoproliferations, e.g. for the discrimination of reactive versus malignant lesions. Further applications are detection of disease dissemination and evaluation of the clonal relationship of two lymphomas. However, clonality analysis is not a stand-alone test and must always be considered in context with clinical, histological and immunophenotypic data. For the correct use of clonality analysis, comprehensive knowledge of the biological basis, technical requirements and interpretation are needed in order to avoid incorrect conclusions.
BACKGROUND: A dysregulated immune response is considered one of the major factors leading to severe COVID-19. Previously described mechanisms include the development of a cytokine storm, missing immunoglobulin class swit...BACKGROUND: A dysregulated immune response is considered one of the major factors leading to severe COVID-19. Previously described mechanisms include the development of a cytokine storm, missing immunoglobulin class switch, antibody-mediated enhancement, and aberrant antigen presentation. OBJECTIVES: To understand the heterogeneity of immune response in COVID-19, a thorough investigation of histomorphological patterns in regional lymph nodes was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lymph nodes from the cervical, mediastinal, and hilar regions were extracted from autopsies of patients with lethal COVID-19 (n = 20). Histomorphological characteristics, SARS-CoV‑2 qRT-PCR, and gene expression profiling on common genes involved in immunologic response were analyzed. RESULTS: Lymph nodes displayed moderate to severe capillary stasis and edema, an increased presence of extrafollicular plasmablasts, mild to moderate plasmacytosis, a dominant population of CD8 T‑cells, and CD11c/CD68 histiocytosis with hemophagocytic activity. Out of 20 cases, 18 presented with hypoplastic or missing germinal centers with a decrease of follicular dendritic cells and follicular T‑helper cells. A positive viral load was detected by qRT-PCR in 14 of 20 cases, yet immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 N-antigen revealed positivity in sinus histiocytes of only one case. Gene expression analysis revealed an increased expression of STAT1, CD163, granzyme B, CD8A, MZB1, and PAK1, as well as CXCL9. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our findings imply a dysregulated immune response in lethal COVID-19. The absence/hypoplasia of germinal centers and increased presence of plasmablasts implies a transient B‑cell response, implying an impaired development of long-term immunity against SARS-CoV‑2 in such occasions.
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is considered a systemic disease. A severe course with fatal outcome is possible and unpredictable. OBJECTIVES: Which organ systems are predominantly involved? Which diseases are predisposed for a fa...BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is considered a systemic disease. A severe course with fatal outcome is possible and unpredictable. OBJECTIVES: Which organ systems are predominantly involved? Which diseases are predisposed for a fatal course? Which organ changes are found with lethal outcome? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from published autopsy studies (28 cases by our group) with respect to organ changes and possible cause of death. RESULTS: The most severe alterations are found in the lungs by diffuse alveolar damage as a symptom of an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in part with fibrosis. Thrombosis of small- to mid-sized pulmonary arteries is associated with hemorrhagic lung infarction. Frequent complications are bacterial pneumonias and less frequently fungal pneumonias by aspergillus. Pulmonary thromboembolism is found in 20-30% of lethal courses, also in the absence of deep venous thrombosis. Intestinal involvement of COVID-19 can be associated with intestinal ischemia, caused by shock or local thrombosis. In most cases, the kidneys display acute tubular injury reflecting acute renal failure, depletion of lymphocytes in the lymph nodes and spleen, and hyperplastic adrenal glands. The liver frequently reveals steatosis, liver cell necrosis, portal inflammation, and proliferation of Kupffer cells. Important preexisting diseases in autopsy studies are arterial hypertension with hypertensive and ischemic cardiomyopathy and diabetes mellitus but large population-based studies reveal increased risk of mortality only for diabetes mellitus not for arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of the pulmonary circulation with pulmonary arterial thrombosis, infarction, and bacterial pneumonia are important and often lethal complications of COVID-19-associated ARDS. Findings from autopsy studies have influenced therapy and prophylaxis.
Viral respiratory diseases constitute the most common reasons for hospitalization with more than half of all acute illnesses worldwide. Progressive respiratory failure with pronounced diffuse alveolar damage has been ide...Viral respiratory diseases constitute the most common reasons for hospitalization with more than half of all acute illnesses worldwide. Progressive respiratory failure with pronounced diffuse alveolar damage has been identified as the primary cause of death in COVID-19. COVID-19 pneumonia shares common histopathological hallmarks with influenza (H1N1)-related ARDS, like diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) with edema, hemorrhage, and intra-alveolar fibrin deposition. The lungs with COVID-19 pneumonia revealed perivascular inflammation, an endothelial injury, microangiopathy, and an aberrant blood vessel neoformation by intussusceptive angiogenesis. While this pronounced angiocentric inflammation is likely be found - to varying degrees - in numerous other organs, e.g., the heart, COVID-19 is hypothesized to be not just a pulmonary, but rather a systemic "vascular disease."