GOAL: This article explores how broad, contextual factors may be influential in the retention of direct care workers (DCWs; i.e., entry-level caregivers) who provide vital support to patients in healthcare settings. We r...GOAL: This article explores how broad, contextual factors may be influential in the retention of direct care workers (DCWs; i.e., entry-level caregivers) who provide vital support to patients in healthcare settings. We reflect on lessons learned from an evaluation of a multisite intervention to improve retention among DCWs employed primarily in hospital settings at three health systems. METHODS: We evaluated a multitiered program for entry-level caregivers that included a risk assessment, a 4-day curriculum, and follow-up sessions, as well as workforce coaching at the three health systems. As part of our evaluation, we collected data on roughly 3,000 DCWs from the three health systems; the information included hiring date, any transfer date, and any termination date for each new DCW, as well as demographic information, position characteristics, and termination status and reasons for any termination. In addition, we collected information about organizational characteristics, including staffing and number of employees. We also conducted interviews with 56 DCWs and 21 staff members who implemented a retention program across each of the three health systems and remotely conducted virtual observations of the curriculum sessions at each system. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Although the program we evaluated focused on individual-level factors that may affect retention, our findings revealed other broader, contextual challenges faced by DCWs that they said would have an impact on their willingness to stay in their positions. These challenges included (1) job-related factors including limited compensation, aspects of the job itself, and the inability to advance in one's position; (2) health system challenges including the mission, policies, staffing, and organizational culture; and (3) external factors including federal policies and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: As the direct care workforce continues to grow, interventions to improve retention should consider the interconnectedness of these multilevel factors rather than solely individual-level factors. In addition, further research is needed to rigorously evaluate any potential intervention and consider how such an approach can target DCWs in hospital-based settings who are most affected by the multilevel challenges identified. Finally, any intervention to improve retention must be also aligned to ensure equity, especially in this population of low-wage DCWs, many of whom are marginalized women and individuals of color.
GOAL: As of January 1, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requires most U.S. hospitals to publish pricing information on their website to help consumers make decisions regarding services and to transform...GOAL: As of January 1, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requires most U.S. hospitals to publish pricing information on their website to help consumers make decisions regarding services and to transform negotiations with health insurers. For this study, we evaluated changes in hospitals' compliance with the federal price transparency rule after the first year of enactment, during which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased the penalty for noncompliance. METHODS: Using a nationally representative random sample of 470 hospitals, we assessed compliance with both parts of the hospital transparency rule (publishing a machine-readable price database and a consumer shopping tool) in the first quarter of 2022 and compared its baseline level in the first quarter of 2021. Using data from the American Hospital Association and Clarivate, we next assessed how compliance varied by hospital factors (ownership, number of beds, system membership, teaching status, type of electronic health record system), market factors (hospital and insurer market concentration), and the estimated change in penalty for noncompliance. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: By early 2022, 46% of hospitals had posted both machine-readable and consumer-shoppable data, an increase of 24% from the prior year. Almost 9 in 10 hospitals had complied with the consumer-shoppable data requirement by early 2022. Larger hospitals and public hospitals had lower probabilities of baseline compliance with the machine-readable and consumer-shoppable requirements, respectively, although public hospitals were significantly more likely to become compliant with the consumer-shoppable requirement by 2022. Higher hospital market concentration was also associated with higher baseline compliance for both the machine-readable and consumer-shoppable requirements. Furthermore, our analyses found that hospitals with certain electronic health record systems were more likely to comply with the consumer-shoppable requirement in 2021 and became increasingly compliant with the machine-readable requirement in 2022. Finally, we found that hospitals with a larger estimated penalty were more likely to become compliant with the machine-readable requirement. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Longitudinal analyses of compliance with the federal price transparency rule are valuable for monitoring changes in hospitals' behavior and assessing whether compliance changes vary systematically for specific types of hospitals and/or market structures. Our results suggest a trend toward increased hospital compliance between 2021 and 2022. Although hospitals perceive the consumer-shopping tools as being the most impactful, the value of this information depends on whether it is comprehensible and comparable across hospitals. The new price transparency rule has facilitated the creation of new data that have the potential to significantly alter the competitive landscape for hospitals and may require hospital leaders to consider how their organizational strategies change concerning their engagement with payers and patients. Finally, greater price transparency is likely to bolster national policy discussions related to price variation, affordability, and the role of regulation in healthcare markets.
GOAL: Clinician stress and resilience have been the subjects of significant research and interest in the past several decades. We aimed to understand the factors that contribute to clinician stress and resilience in orde...GOAL: Clinician stress and resilience have been the subjects of significant research and interest in the past several decades. We aimed to understand the factors that contribute to clinician stress and resilience in order to appropriately guide potential interventions. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review (n = 42) of published reviews of research on clinician distress and resilience using the methodology of Peters and colleagues (2020). Our team examined these reviews using the National Academy of Medicine's framework for clinician well-being and resilience. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found that organizational factors, learning/practice environment, and healthcare responsibilities were three of the top four factors identified in the reviews as contributing to clinician distress. Learning/practice environment and organizational factors were two of the top four factors identified in the reviews as contributing to their resilience. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Clinicians continue to face numerous external challenges that complicate their work. Further research, practice, and policy changes are indicated to improve practice environments for healthcare clinicians. Healthcare leaders need to promote resources for organizational and system-level changes to improve clinician well-being.
GOAL: Rising incidents of violence and mistreatment of healthcare workers by patients and visitors have been reported. U.S. healthcare workers are five times more likely to experience nonfatal workplace violence (WPV) th...GOAL: Rising incidents of violence and mistreatment of healthcare workers by patients and visitors have been reported. U.S. healthcare workers are five times more likely to experience nonfatal workplace violence (WPV) than workers in any other profession. However, less is known about the national trends in the incidence of violence and mistreatment in healthcare. The specific organizational and individual-level factors that relate to stress arising from these occurrences specifically by patients and family members are also not fully understood. The goals of this study were to examine national trends of violence toward healthcare workers, understand which populations are most vulnerable to stress from violence and mistreatment, and explore organizational factors that are related to these occurrences. METHODS: Data were collected from three sources: (1) The Bureau of Labor Statistics Intentional Injury by Another Person data for the period 2011-2020, (2) data from a large national workers' compensation claim services provider for the period 2018-2022, and (3) results from a survey distributed at a large medical center in June and July 2022. Data were represented graphically and analyzed using multivariate regression and dominance analysis to identify specific predictors of WPV and mistreatment among healthcare workers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of the total surveyed sample, 23.7% of participants reported mistreatment from patients or visitors as a major stressor and 14.6% reported WPV from patients or visitors as a major stressor. Stress from mistreatment and WPV was most frequently reported by nurses, employees aged 18 to 24 years other than nurses, those who identified as White, and those who identified as female or a gender minority. The emergency room (ER) showed the highest percentages of stress from mistreatment (61.8%) and violence (55.9%) from patients or visitors. The top predictors of stress from WPV and mistreatment by patients or visitors among healthcare workers ranked high to low were working in the ER, working as a nurse, a lack of necessary supplies or equipment, patient or visitor attitudes or beliefs about COVID-19, and working in a hospital-based unit. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: In addition to protecting employees as a moral imperative, preventing WPV is critical for organizational performance. Employee productivity is estimated to decrease up to 50% in the 6 to 18 weeks following an incident of violence, while turnover can increase 30% to 40%. An effective WPV prevention plan and a proactive approach to supporting the physical and mental health conditions that may result from WPV can mitigate the potential costs and exposures from these incidents. Organizations must also set clear expectations of behavior with patients and visitors by refusing to tolerate violence and mistreatment of caregivers. The impact of WPV can remain present and active for up to 8 years following an incident. Policy-level interventions are also needed. Currently, there are no federal protections for healthcare workers related to violence, though some states have made it a felony to abuse healthcare workers.
GOAL: Research has highlighted psychological distress resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCWs), including the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). However, the degree to which the...GOAL: Research has highlighted psychological distress resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCWs), including the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). However, the degree to which these conditions have endured beyond the pandemic and the extent to which they affect the entire healthcare team, including both clinical and nonclinical workers, remain unknown. This study aims to identify correlates of PTSS in the entire healthcare workforce with the goal of providing evidence to support the development of trauma-informed leadership strategies. METHODS: Data were collected from June to July 2022 using a cross-sectional anonymous survey in a large academic medical center setting. A total of 6,466 clinical and nonclinical employees completed the survey (27.3% response rate). Cases with at least one missing variable were omitted, for a total sample size of 4,806, the evaluation of which enabled us to understand individual, organizational, and work-related and nonwork-related stressors associated with PTSS. Data were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression and dominance analyses to identify predictors of PTSS specific to clinical and nonclinical workers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: While previous studies have shown that HCWs in different job roles experience unique stressors, our data indicate that the top correlates of PTSS among both clinical and nonclinical HCWs are the same: burnout, moral distress, and compassion fatigue. These three factors alone explained 45% and 44.4% of the variance in PTSS in clinical and nonclinical workers, respectively. PTSS was also associated with a lower sense of recognition and feeling mistreated by other employees at work in the clinical workforce. Concerningly, women and sexual minorities in the clinical sample exhibited a higher incidence of PTSS. In nonclinical workers, social isolation or loneliness and lower trust and confidence in senior leadership were associated with PTSS. Nonwork-related factors, such as exhaustion from caregiving responsibilities and financial strain, were also significantly associated with PTSS. Even after controlling for discrimination at and outside of work in both samples, we found that non-White populations were more likely to experience PTSS, highlighting a deeply concerning issue in the healthcare workforce. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The primary objective of this article is to help healthcare leaders understand the correlates of PTSS across the entire healthcare team as organizations recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding which factors are associated with PTSS will help healthcare leaders develop best practices that aim to reduce HCW distress and strategies to circumvent trauma derived from future crises. Our data indicate that leaders must address the correlates of PTSS in the workforce, focusing attention on both those who work on the frontlines and those who work behind the scenes. We urge leaders to adopt a trauma-informed leadership approach to ensure that the entire healthcare workforce is recognized, supported, and cared for as each HCW plays a unique role in the care of patients.
GOAL: This article describes the development and implementation of a behavior intervention response team (BIRT). Pilot data indicate the successful implementation of BIRT interventions with patients and families and the...GOAL: This article describes the development and implementation of a behavior intervention response team (BIRT). Pilot data indicate the successful implementation of BIRT interventions with patients and families and the positive staff response to these interventions. METHODS: Patient- and family-disruptive behaviors are increasing in hospitals. Those behaviors arise from stress, financial burdens, and the mental weight of the patient's medical condition on the family. These distressed patients and their families tax an already overwhelmed staff, exacerbating the caregivers' exhaustion, depersonalization, and frustration. We recognized the need to proactively address these disruptions at our children's hospital with an interdisciplinary response. Disciplines engaged in the BIRT development included risk management, behavioral health, child life, service excellence, patient and family services, social work, and chaplaincy. Following multiple brainstorming sessions, we created a comprehensive, clear intervention strategy to engage with a disruptive patient or family. The BIRT was developed to work with both the family and their medical team to intervene at the first signs of potential disruption. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: With the BIRT, we were able to reduce disruptive behaviors and limit the subsequent removal of problematic individuals from the facility. Of the families who worked with the BIRT, 75.8% required no postintervention follow-up. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The development of a BIRT can help head off disruptive behaviors and improve family-medical team relationships to support the highest quality and safest healthcare.
GOAL: Employee assistance programs (EAPs) have been evolving since they first became prevalent in the 1970s. The important counseling component of EAPs is sometimes lost in discussions about what they do, with many EAPs...GOAL: Employee assistance programs (EAPs) have been evolving since they first became prevalent in the 1970s. The important counseling component of EAPs is sometimes lost in discussions about what they do, with many EAPs marketing a broad portfolio of services such as childcare, elder care, legal referral, and other concierge services rather than counseling. The objective of this study was to examine outcomes for the EAP of one organization (Mayo Clinic), compare them to outcomes reported in the literature, and gain insights to help all healthcare organizations best support their employees. METHODS: Consistent with customary EAP practice, data for this study was collected through an anonymous survey link distributed by e-mail to users of individual counseling as well as users of organizational consulting services such as advising leaders and supervisors and leading educational sessions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All (n = 82) individual counseling respondents indicated they would recommend the EAP, none reported worse symptoms, 90% decreased their stress levels, 92% reduced their feelings of anxiety, 88% enjoyed an overall improvement in mood, and 95% developed new skills. If their concern was work-related, 96% agreed the counselor understood the work culture and was able to provide helpful guidance; of the clients who were feeling burned out, 86% agreed they gained strategies to reduce its symptoms. Thematic analysis of individual counseling services indicated that participants highly valued their counselors. Regarding organizational consulting services, respondents (n = 50) indicated EAP services increased their confidence as leaders, supported their work, and provided tangible guidance. They appreciated having an internal EAP counselor. Thematic analysis of organizational consulting services indicated that EAP supported leaders by listening, coaching, and empowering them to normalize issues. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: EAPs have evolved into distinct internal, external, and hybrid internal-external models. Internal model counselors are company employees with inside knowledge of company culture, external EAP model counselors are contracted outside of the company, and hybrid models combine a small cadre of internal counselors with the support of outside contractors. Regardless of the model, EAP counselors must collaborate with internal stakeholders, notably the human resources department, to efficiently identify and troubleshoot employee relational issues and allow for customized initiatives to improve mental health. Based upon these findings and the authors' direct experiences with EAP providers, components of an ideal EAP are outlined to show how EAPs can best support employees. Healthcare leaders seeking to add EAP services are advised to focus on offerings that are custom fit to the organization.
J Healthc Manag
· 2023 Nov-Dec 01 · PMID 37944171
·
Full text
GOAL: This study aimed to understand prescribing providers' perceptions of electronic health record (EHR) effectiveness in enabling them to identify and prevent opioid misuse and addiction. METHODS: We used a cross-secti...GOAL: This study aimed to understand prescribing providers' perceptions of electronic health record (EHR) effectiveness in enabling them to identify and prevent opioid misuse and addiction. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional survey designed and administered by KLAS Research to examine healthcare providers' perceptions of their experiences with EHR systems. Univariate analysis and mixed-effects logistic regression analysis with organization-level random effects were performed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 17,790 prescribing providers responded to the survey question related to this article's primary outcome about opioid misuse prevention. Overall, 34% of respondents believed EHRs helped prevent opioid misuse and addiction. Advanced practice providers were more likely than attending physicians and trainees to believe EHRs were effective in reducing opioid misuse, as were providers with fewer than 5 years of experience. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Understanding providers' perceptions of EHR effectiveness is critical as the health outcome of reducing opioid misuse depends upon their willingness to adopt and apply new technology to their standardized routines. Healthcare managers can enhance providers' use of EHRs to facilitate the prevention of opioid misuse with ongoing training related to advanced EHR system features.
GOAL: Instead of considering many variables for the accurate measurement of healthcare efficiency, working with the select few variables that really affect efficiency will provide more accurate efficiency scores. In addi...GOAL: Instead of considering many variables for the accurate measurement of healthcare efficiency, working with the select few variables that really affect efficiency will provide more accurate efficiency scores. In addition, calculating the efficiency by weighting the inputs and outputs according to their effect and severity levels will give more realistic results. In this article, a three-step hybrid system with a two-stage CCA (canonical correlation analysis)-DEA/AR (data envelopment analysis/assurance region) model is proposed to obtain results of health efficiency. METHODS: Healthcare efficiency studies conducted between 2000 and 2020 were reviewed. In this examination of the input and output variables used in the DEA of 63 previous studies, the 6 inputs and 5 outputs preferred by previous researchers were determined. Afterward, the health efficiency scores of countries represented in the research were calculated with weight-restricted DEA, and CCA was used for a priori statistical analysis in determining the weights. Thus, in this analysis of the preferred outputs and inputs with the help of CCA to estimate the relationship between multiple input and output sets, the variables that had no effect were eliminated and the ones that had an effect were included in DEA/AR with their degree of effectiveness. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For the model proposed here, three inputs and three outputs were identified by following a five-item variable reduction procedure. The numbers of doctors and nurses were identified as the most effective inputs, and infant mortality rates were found to be the most effective outputs. Therefore, health efficiency scores obtained with the proposed CCA-DEA/AR model and the basic DEA are presented together. A review of the results found fewer health-efficient countries with the weight-restricted DEA. This is proof that weighting the variables into the DEA increases the discriminating power of the method. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: By applying the proposed model, healthcare administrators can analyze healthcare efficiency accurately and thus improve efficiency by transferring limited resources to the right places according to deficiencies or surpluses identified by the model's inputs. Resources can be allocated at both private and public hospitals in a way that increases healthcare efficiency outputs.
GOALS: Equity in the U.S. healthcare system remains a vital goal for healthcare leaders. Although many hospitals and healthcare systems have adopted a social determinants of health approach to more equitable care, many c...GOALS: Equity in the U.S. healthcare system remains a vital goal for healthcare leaders. Although many hospitals and healthcare systems have adopted a social determinants of health approach to more equitable care, many challenges have limited the effectiveness of their efforts. In this study, we wanted to explore whether healthcare leaders and providers understand the concept of equity and can link the concepts to practical applications within healthcare systems. METHODS: We explored how hospital leadership and providers at a major public hospital in Atlanta, Georgia, understand equity topics both conceptually and at a practical implementation level. We conducted 28 focus groups for >4 months involving 233 staff members, during which participants were asked about their understanding of various equity-related terms and equity implementation within the hospital. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Our findings reveal that there is little consensus among staff regarding the conceptual meanings of various health equity-related terms, and only a small minority of staff can articulate a conceptual definition that reflects current research-based understandings of equity. Furthermore, there is little consensus regarding how staff believes that health equity is practically enacted through various hospital programs, even among interviewees who could correctly articulate equity topics. These findings have no association with a role in the organization or length of time employed at the hospital. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: These findings indicate a need for a more nuanced understanding of health equity and further clarification and education on how to implement health equity. Although understanding at the conceptual level is an important first step, conceptual knowledge alone is not enough to support health equity at either the individual staff level or the system level. Our recommendations cover strategic development; education specific to the hospital system and its unique needs; consideration of the specific roles of individuals in the organization; and the designation of diversity, equity, and inclusion staff and offices in a hospital organization.
GOAL: This study investigated the association between Lean and performance outcomes in U.S. public hospitals. Public hospitals face substantial pressure to deliver high-quality care with limited resources. Lean-based man...GOAL: This study investigated the association between Lean and performance outcomes in U.S. public hospitals. Public hospitals face substantial pressure to deliver high-quality care with limited resources. Lean-based management systems can provide these hospitals with alternative approaches to improve efficiency and effectiveness. Prior research shows that Lean can have positive impacts in hospitals ranging in ownership type, but more study is needed, specifically in publicly owned hospitals. METHODS: We performed multivariable regressions using data from the 2017 National Survey of Lean/Transformational Performance Improvement. The data were linked to publicly available hospital performance data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We examined 11 outcomes measuring financial performance, quality of care, and patient experience and their associations with Lean adoption. We also explored potential drivers of positive outcomes by examining Lean implementation in each hospital, measured as the number of units using Lean tools and practices; leader commitment to Lean principles; Lean training and education among physicians, nurses, and managers; and use of a daily management system among C-suite leaders and managers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Lean adoption and implementation were associated with improved performance in U.S. public hospitals. Compared with hospitals that did not adopt Lean, those that did had significantly lower adjusted inpatient expenses per discharge and higher-than-average national scores on the appropriate use of medical imaging and timeliness of care. The study results also showed marginally significant improvements in patient experience and hospital earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization margins. Focusing on these select outcomes, we found that drivers of such improvements involved the extent of Lean implementation, as reflected by leadership commitment, daily management, and training/education while controlling for the number of years using Lean. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Lean is a method of continuous improvement centered around a culture of providing high-value care for patients. Our findings provide insight into the potential benefits of Lean in U.S. public hospitals. Notably, they suggest that leader buy-in is key to success. When executives and managers support Lean initiatives and provide proper training for the workforce, improved financial and operational performance can result. This commitment, starting with upper management, may also play a broader role in the effort to reform healthcare while having a positive impact on patient care in U.S. public hospitals.
GOAL: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to retrospectively evaluate pharmacist time to clinical surveillance alert intervention before and after implementing a pharmacy-directed alert priority category...GOAL: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to retrospectively evaluate pharmacist time to clinical surveillance alert intervention before and after implementing a pharmacy-directed alert priority category across a large for-profit United States health system with well-established clinical pharmacy surveillance software integrated into the clinical pharmacy workflow. The findings contributed to a financial evaluation of pharmacist productivity compared with drug spend for pharmacy-directed interventions that included intravenous (IV)-to-oral-conversion and renal dosing opportunities. METHODS: A retrospective quality improvement pre-/postanalysis of deidentified, prepopulated clinical surveillance alert data for the preimplementation period of January 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021, was compared with that for the postimplementation period of November 1, 2021, to January 31, 2022, for 169 hospitals. Clinical pharmacist workflow was mapped pre- and postimplementation. The average time to alert intervention was calculated using the mean time in minutes between the alert firing within the software and when the pharmacist reviewed the alert, grouped by hospital, alert status, and priority category. Medications converted from IV to oral were assessed using the clinical surveillance software IV-to-oral calculator. Postimplementation renal dose cost savings were modeled using pharmacist-completed alerts by rule name that indicated a possible dose decrease based on the patient's renal function and current medication. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Time to alert intervention for all completed pharmacist interventions was reduced for high-priority alerts by 32.6 min (p < .001) and routine-priority alerts by 65.1 min (p = .147). Alerts that moved to the pharmacy-directed alert priority category resulted in a reduced time to alert intervention of 38.7 min (p = .003). Normalized average wholesale price (AWP) cost savings from IV-to-oral conversion within 3 days of conversion eligibility were $1,693,600 in the preimplementation period and $1,867,400 in the postimplementation period, a $173,700 increase in cost savings. A total of 7,972 completed postimplementation renal dose adjustments resulted in a modeled AWP normalized cost savings of $1,076,700. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Results indicated that optimizing clinical surveillance software alerts was effective and increased pharmacist productivity. Specifically, creating a pharmacy-directed alert category that pharmacists were able to complete by hospital policy or protocol improved workflow efficiency and increased IV-to-oral medication conversion cost savings. Further study is needed to validate the renal dose-modeled cost savings and address the financial benefits of quality measures to prevent acute kidney injury.