Transcription
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37312570
·
Full text
Cell type-specific gene expression is coordinated by DNA-encoded enhancers and the transcription factors (TFs) that bind to them in a sequence-specific manner. As such, these enhancers and TFs are critical mediators of n...Cell type-specific gene expression is coordinated by DNA-encoded enhancers and the transcription factors (TFs) that bind to them in a sequence-specific manner. As such, these enhancers and TFs are critical mediators of normal development and altered enhancer or TF function is associated with the development of diseases such as cancer. While initially defined by their ability to activate gene transcription in reporter assays, putative enhancer elements are now frequently defined by their unique chromatin features including DNase hypersensitivity and transposase accessibility, bidirectional enhancer RNA (eRNA) transcription, CpG hypomethylation, high H3K27ac and H3K4me1, sequence-specific transcription factor binding, and co-factor recruitment. Identification of these chromatin features through sequencing-based assays has revolutionized our ability to identify enhancer elements on a genome-wide scale, and genome-wide functional assays are now capitalizing on this information to greatly expand our understanding of how enhancers function to provide spatiotemporal coordination of gene expression programs. Here, we highlight recent technological advances that are providing new insights into the molecular mechanisms by which these critical cis-regulatory elements function in gene control. We pay particular attention to advances in our understanding of enhancer transcription, enhancer-promoter syntax, 3D organization and biomolecular condensates, transcription factor and co-factor dependencies, and the development of genome-wide functional enhancer screens.
Transcription
· 2023 Nov · PMID 37132022
·
Full text
RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is composed of 12 subunits that collaborate to synthesize mRNA within the nucleus. Pol II is widely recognized as a passive holoenzyme, with the molecular functions of its subunits largely igno...RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is composed of 12 subunits that collaborate to synthesize mRNA within the nucleus. Pol II is widely recognized as a passive holoenzyme, with the molecular functions of its subunits largely ignored. Recent studies employing auxin-inducible degron (AID) and multi-omics techniques have revealed that the functional diversity of Pol II is achieved through the differential contributions of its subunits to various transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes. By regulating these processes in a coordinated manner through its subunits, Pol II can optimize its activity for diverse biological functions. Here, we review recent progress in understanding Pol II subunits and their dysregulation in diseases, Pol II heterogeneity, Pol II clusters and the regulatory roles of RNA polymerases.
Single-cell sequencing of RNA (scRNA-seq) has advanced our understanding of cellular heterogeneity and signaling in developmental biology and disease. A large number of complementary assays have been developed to profile...Single-cell sequencing of RNA (scRNA-seq) has advanced our understanding of cellular heterogeneity and signaling in developmental biology and disease. A large number of complementary assays have been developed to profile transcriptomes of individual cells, also in combination with other readouts, such as chromatin accessibility or antibody-based analysis of protein surface markers. As scRNA-seq technologies are advancing fast, it is challenging to establish robust workflows and up-to-date protocols that are best suited to address the large range of research questions. Here, we review scRNA-seq techniques from mRNA end-counting to total RNA in relation to their specific features and outline the necessary sample preparation steps and quality control measures. Based on our experience in dealing with the continuously growing portfolio from the perspective of a central single-cell facility, we aim to provide guidance on how workflows can be best automatized and share our experience in coping with the continuous expansion of scRNA-seq techniques.
Across all kingdoms of life, gene regulatory mechanisms underlie cellular adaptation to ever-changing environments. Regulation of gene expression adjusts protein synthesis and, in turn, cellular growth. Messenger RNAs ar...Across all kingdoms of life, gene regulatory mechanisms underlie cellular adaptation to ever-changing environments. Regulation of gene expression adjusts protein synthesis and, in turn, cellular growth. Messenger RNAs are key molecules in the process of gene expression. Our ability to quantitatively measure mRNA expression in single cells has improved tremendously over the past decades. This revealed an unexpected coordination between the steps that control the life of an mRNA, from transcription to degradation. Here, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art imaging approaches for measurement and quantitative understanding of gene expression, starting from the early visualizations of single genes by electron microscopy to current fluorescence-based approaches in single cells, including live-cell RNA-imaging approaches to FISH-based spatial transcriptomics across model organisms. We also highlight how these methods have shaped our current understanding of the spatiotemporal coupling between transcriptional and post-transcriptional events in prokaryotes. We conclude by discussing future challenges of this multidisciplinary field. mRNA: messenger RNA; rRNA: ribosomal rDNA; tRNA: transfer RNA; sRNA: small RNA; FISH: fluorescence hybridization; RNP: ribonucleoprotein; smFISH: single RNA molecule FISH; smiFISH: single molecule inexpensive FISH; HCR-FISH: Hybridization Chain-Reaction-FISH; RCA: Rolling Circle Amplification; seqFISH: Sequential FISH; MERFISH: Multiplexed error robust FISH; UTR: Untranslated region; RBP: RNA binding protein; FP: fluorescent protein; eGFP: enhanced GFP, MCP: MS2 coat protein; PCP: PP7 coat protein; MB: Molecular beacons; sgRNA: single guide RNA.
Transcription
· 2023 Nov · PMID 36951297
·
Full text
can enter a diapause stage called "dauer" when it senses that the environment is not suitable for development. This implies a detour from the typical developmental trajectory and requires a tight control of the developme...can enter a diapause stage called "dauer" when it senses that the environment is not suitable for development. This implies a detour from the typical developmental trajectory and requires a tight control of the developmental clock and a massive tissue remodeling. In the last decades, core components of the signaling pathways that govern the dauer development decision have been identified, but the tissues where they function for the acquisition of dauer-specific traits are still under intense study. Growing evidence demonstrates that these pathways engage in complex cross-talk and feedback loops. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the transcriptional regulation of the dauer program and the relevant tissues for its achievement. A better understanding of this process will provide insight on how developmental plasticity is achieved and how development decisions are under a robust regulation to ensure an all-or-nothing response. Furthermore, this developmental decision can also serve as a simplified model for relevant developmental disorders. AID Auxin Induced Degron DA dafachronic acid Daf-c dauer formation constitutive Daf-d dauer formation defective DTC Distal Tip Cells ECM modified extracellular matrix GPCRs G protein-coupled receptors IIS insulin/IGF-1 signaling ILPs insulin-like peptides LBD Ligand Binding Domain PDL4 Post Dauer L4 TGF-β transforming growth factor beta WT wild-type.
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) is an immunofluorescence assay, which determines in situ interaction of two biomolecules present within 40 nm close proximity. Here, we describe a modification of PLA for visual detection o...Proximity ligation assay (PLA) is an immunofluorescence assay, which determines in situ interaction of two biomolecules present within 40 nm close proximity. Here, we describe a modification of PLA for visual detection of in situ protein interactions with nascent RNA in a single cell (IPNR-PLA). In IPNR-PLA, nascent RNA is labeled by incorporating 5-fluorouridine (FU), a uridine nucleotide analogue, followed by covalent cross-linking of the interacting partners in proximity to newly synthesized RNA. By using combination of anti-BrdU antibody, which specifically binds to FU, and primary antibody against a protein of interest, the IPNR reaction results in fluorescent puncta as a positive signal, only if the candidate proteins are in proximity to nascent RNA. We have validated this method by demonstrating known CDK9 and elongating RNA pol II interaction with nascent RNA. Finally, we used this method to test for the presence of DNA double strand breaks as well as Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), an RNA binding protein, in the vicinity of nascent RNA in cancer cells. The capability of performing parallel IF labeling and quantifiable multiparameter measurements within heterogeneous cell populations makes IPNR-PLA very attractive for use in biological studies. Overall, we have developed the IPNR-PLA method for analysis of protein association with nascent RNA with single-cell resolution, which is highly sensitive, quantitative, efficient, and requires little starting experimental material.
Transcription
· 2023 Nov · PMID 36843061
·
Full text
Eukaryotic cells rely upon dynamic, multifaceted regulation at each step of RNA biogenesis to maintain mRNA pools and ensure normal protein synthesis. Studies in budding yeast indicate a buffering phenomenon that preserv...Eukaryotic cells rely upon dynamic, multifaceted regulation at each step of RNA biogenesis to maintain mRNA pools and ensure normal protein synthesis. Studies in budding yeast indicate a buffering phenomenon that preserves global mRNA levels through the reciprocal balancing of RNA synthesis rates and mRNA decay. In short, changes in transcription impact the efficiency of mRNA degradation and defects in either nuclear or cytoplasmic mRNA degradation are somehow sensed and relayed to control a compensatory change in mRNA transcription rates. Here, we review current views on molecular mechanisms that might explain this apparent bidirectional sensing process that ensures homeostasis of the stable mRNA pool.
Transcription
· 2023 Nov · PMID 36757099
·
Full text
Microsporidia are eukaryotic obligate intracellular parasites closely related to fungi. Co-evolving with infected hosts, microsporidia have highly reduced their genomes and lacked several biological components. As it is...Microsporidia are eukaryotic obligate intracellular parasites closely related to fungi. Co-evolving with infected hosts, microsporidia have highly reduced their genomes and lacked several biological components. As it is beneficial for intracellular parasites like microsporidia to reduce their genome size, it is therefore reasonable to assume that genes encoding multifactorial complex machinery of transcription could be a potential target to be excluded from microsporidian genomes during the reductive evolution. In such a case, an evolutionary dilemma occurs because microsporidia cannot remove all transcription-machinery-encoding genes, products of which are essential for initialthe initial steps of gene expression. Here, I propose that while genes encoding core machinery are conserved, several genes known to function in fine-tune regulation of transcription are absent. This genome compaction strategy may come at the cost of loosely regulated or less controllable transcription. Alternatively, analogous to microsporidian polar tube, the parasites may have specialized factors to regulate their RNA synthesis.
Transcription termination is known to occur via two mechanisms in bacteria, intrinsic termination (also frequently referred to as Rho-independent or factor-independent termination) and Rho-dependent termination. Based pr...Transcription termination is known to occur via two mechanisms in bacteria, intrinsic termination (also frequently referred to as Rho-independent or factor-independent termination) and Rho-dependent termination. Based primarily on studies using RNA polymerase, it was generally assumed that intrinsic termination and Rho-dependent termination are distinct mechanisms and that the signals required for intrinsic termination are present primarily within the nucleic acids. In this review, we detail recent findings from studies in showing that intrinsic termination in this organism is highly stimulated by NusA, NusG, and even Rho. In NusA-stimulated intrinsic termination, NusA facilitates the formation of weak terminator hairpins and compensates for distal U-rich tract interruptions. In NusG-stimulated intrinsic termination, NusG stabilizes a sequence-dependent pause at the point of termination, which extends the time frame for RNA hairpins with weak terminal base pairs to form in either a NusA-stimulated or a NusA-independent fashion. In Rho-stimulated intrinsic termination, Rho prevents the formation of antiterminator-like RNA structures that could otherwise compete with the terminator hairpin. Combined, NusA, NusG, and Rho stimulate approximately 97% of all intrinsic terminators in . Thus, the general view that intrinsic termination is primarily a factor-independent process needs to be revised to account for recent findings. Moreover, the historical distinction between Rho-dependent and intrinsic termination is overly simplistic and needs to be modernized.
Transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) has emerged as a regulatory hub in gene expression. A key control point occurs during early transcription elongation when Pol II pauses in the promoter-proximal regi...Transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) has emerged as a regulatory hub in gene expression. A key control point occurs during early transcription elongation when Pol II pauses in the promoter-proximal region at the majority of genes in mammalian cells and at a large set of genes in . An increasing number of -acting factors have been linked to promoter-proximal pausing. Some factors help to establish the pause, whereas others are required for the release of Pol II into productive elongation. A dysfunction of this elongation control point leads to aberrant gene expression and can contribute to disease development. The BET bromodomain protein BRD4 has been implicated in elongation control. However, only recently direct BRD4-specific functions in Pol II transcription elongation have been uncovered. This mainly became possible with technological advances that allow selective and rapid ablation of BRD4 in cells along with the availability of approaches that capture the immediate consequences on nascent transcription. This review sheds light on the experimental breakthroughs that led to the emerging view of BRD4 as a general regulator of transcription elongation.
The processing of the proximal and distal poly(A) sites in alternative polyadenylation (APA) has long been thought to independently occur on pre-mRNAs during transcription. However, a recent study by our groups demonstra...The processing of the proximal and distal poly(A) sites in alternative polyadenylation (APA) has long been thought to independently occur on pre-mRNAs during transcription. However, a recent study by our groups demonstrated that the proximal sites for many genes could be activated sequentially following the distal ones, suggesting a multi-cleavage-same-transcript mode beyond the canonical one-cleavage-per-transcript view. Here, we review the established mechanisms for APA regulation and then discuss the additional insights into APA regulation from the perspective of sequential polyadenylation, resulting in a unified leverage model for understanding the mechanisms of regulated APA.
Transcription regulation is an important mechanism that controls pluripotency and differentiation. Transcription factors dictate cell fate decisions by functioning cooperatively with chromatin regulators. We have recentl...Transcription regulation is an important mechanism that controls pluripotency and differentiation. Transcription factors dictate cell fate decisions by functioning cooperatively with chromatin regulators. We have recently demonstrated that BEND3 (BANP, E5R and Nac1 domain) protein regulates the expression of differentiation-associated genes by modulating the chromatin architecture at promoters. We highlight the collaboration of BEND3 with the polycomb repressive complex in coordinating transcription repression and propose a model highlighting the relevance of the BEND3-PRC2 axis in gene regulation and chromatin organization. BEND3, BANP, E5R and Nac1 domain; rDNA, ribosomal DNA; PRC2, Repressive Complex 2; H3K27me3, Histone H3 Lysine 27 methylation; PcG, Polycomb group.
Initially discovered by genetic screens in budding yeast, SPT5 and its partner SPT4 form a stable complex known as DSIF in metazoa, which plays pleiotropic roles in multiple steps of transcription. SPT5 is the most conse...Initially discovered by genetic screens in budding yeast, SPT5 and its partner SPT4 form a stable complex known as DSIF in metazoa, which plays pleiotropic roles in multiple steps of transcription. SPT5 is the most conserved transcription elongation factor, being found in all three domains of life; however, its structure has evolved to include new domains and associated posttranslational modifications. These gained features have expanded transcriptional functions of SPT5, likely to meet the demand for increasingly complex regulation of transcription in higher organisms. This review discusses the pleiotropic roles of SPT5 in transcription, including RNA polymerase II (Pol II) stabilization, enhancer activation, Pol II pausing and its release, elongation, and termination, with a focus on the most recent progress of SPT5 functions in regulating metazoan transcription.
The Mediator complex was discovered in the early 1990s as a biochemically fractionated factor from yeast extracts that was necessary for activator-stimulated transcriptional activation to be observed in transcription as...The Mediator complex was discovered in the early 1990s as a biochemically fractionated factor from yeast extracts that was necessary for activator-stimulated transcriptional activation to be observed in transcription assays. The structure of this large, multi-protein complex is now understood in great detail, and novel genetic approaches have provided rich insights into its dynamics during transcriptional activation and the mechanism by which it facilitates activated transcription. Here I review recent findings and unanswered questions regarding Mediator dynamics, the roles of individual subunits, and differences between its function in yeast and metazoan cells.
N-terminal methylation (Nα-methylation) by the methyltransferase NRMT1 is an important post-translational modification that regulates protein-DNA interactions. Accordingly, its loss impairs functions that are reliant on...N-terminal methylation (Nα-methylation) by the methyltransferase NRMT1 is an important post-translational modification that regulates protein-DNA interactions. Accordingly, its loss impairs functions that are reliant on such interactions, including DNA repair and transcriptional regulation. The global loss of Nα-methylation results in severe developmental and premature aging phenotypes, but given over 300 predicted substrates, it is hard to discern which physiological substrates contribute to each phenotype. One of the most striking phenotypes in NRMT1 knockout () mice is early liver degeneration. To identify the disrupted signaling pathways leading to this phenotype and the NRMT1 substrates involved, we performed RNA-sequencing analysis of control and adult mouse livers. We found both a significant upregulation of transcripts in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family and downregulation of transcripts in the major urinary protein (MUP) family. Interestingly, transcription of both families is inversely regulated by the transcription factor zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2 (ZHX2). ZHX2 contains a non-canonical NRMT1 consensus sequence, indicating that its function could be directly regulated by Nα-methylation. We confirmed misregulation of CYP and MUP mRNA and protein levels in livers and verified NRMT1 can methylate ZHX2 . In addition, we used a mutant of ZHX2 that cannot be methylated to directly demonstrate Nα-methylation promotes ZHX2 transcription factor activity and target promoter occupancy. Finally, we show mice also exhibit early postnatal de-repression of ZHX2 targets involved in fetal liver development. Taken together, these data implicate ZHX2 misregulation as a driving force behind the liver phenotype seen in mice.
The identification of FACT as a histone chaperone enabling transcription through chromatin in vitro has strongly shaped how its roles are envisioned. However, FACT has been implicated in essentially all aspects of chroma...The identification of FACT as a histone chaperone enabling transcription through chromatin in vitro has strongly shaped how its roles are envisioned. However, FACT has been implicated in essentially all aspects of chromatin biology, from transcription to DNA replication, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation. In this review, we focus on recent literature describing the role and mechanisms of FACT during transcription. We highlight the prime importance of FACT in preserving chromatin integrity during transcription and challenge its role as an elongation factor. We also review evidence for FACT's role as a cell-type/gene-specific regulator of gene expression and briefly summarize current efforts at using FACT inhibition as an anti-cancer strategy.
Transcription
· 2021 Oct · PMID 35380917
·
Full text
RNA modifications are prevalent among all the classes of RNA, regulate diverse biological processes, and have emerged as a key regulatory mechanism in post-transcriptional control of gene expression. They are subjected t...RNA modifications are prevalent among all the classes of RNA, regulate diverse biological processes, and have emerged as a key regulatory mechanism in post-transcriptional control of gene expression. They are subjected to precise spatial and temporal control and shown to be critical for the maintenance of normal development and physiology. For example, mA modification of mRNA affects stability, recruitment of RNA binding protein (RBP), translation, and splicing. The deposition of m6A on the RNA happens co-transcriptionally, allowing the tight coupling between the transcription and RNA modification machinery. The mA modification is affected by transcriptional dynamics, but recent insights also suggest that mA machinery impacts transcription and chromatin signature.
Transcription
· 2021 Oct · PMID 35311473
·
Full text
The Integrator was originally discovered as a specialized 3'-end processing endonuclease complex required for maturation of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-dependent small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). Since its discovery, Integrato...The Integrator was originally discovered as a specialized 3'-end processing endonuclease complex required for maturation of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-dependent small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). Since its discovery, Integrator's spectrum of substrates was significantly expanded to include non-polyadenylated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA), enhancer RNAs (eRNAs), telomerase RNA (tertRNA), several Herpesvirus transcripts, and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Recently emerging transcriptome-wide studies reveled an important role of the Integrator in protein-coding genes, where it contributes to gene expression regulation through promoter-proximal transcription attenuation. These new functional data are complemented by several structures of Integrator modules and higher-order complexes, providing mechanistic insights into Integrator-mediated processing events. In this work, we summarize recent progress in our understanding of the structure and function of the Integrator complex.
Transcription
· 2021 Oct · PMID 34874799
·
Full text
The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) consists of YSPTSPS heptapeptide repeats, and the phosphorylation status of the repeats controls multiple transcriptional steps and co-tran...The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) consists of YSPTSPS heptapeptide repeats, and the phosphorylation status of the repeats controls multiple transcriptional steps and co-transcriptional events. However, how CTD phosphorylation status responds to distinct environmental stresses is not fully understood. In this study, we found that a drastic reduction in phosphorylation of a subset of Ser2 residues occurs rapidly but transiently following exposure to HO. ChIP analysis indicated that Ser2-P, and to a lesser extent Tyr1-P was reduced only at the gene 3' end. Significantly, the levels of polyadenylation factor CstF77, as well as Pol II, were also reduced. However, no increase in uncleaved or readthrough RNA products was observed, suggesting transcribing Pol II prematurely terminates at the gene end in response to HO. Further analysis found that the reduction of Ser2-P is, at least in part, regulated by CK2 but independent of FCP1 and other known Ser2 phosphatases. Finally, the HO treatment also affected snRNA 3' processing although surprisingly the U2 processing was not impaired. Together, our data suggest that HO exposure creates a unique CTD phosphorylation state that rapidly alters transcription to deal with acute oxidative stress, perhaps creating a novel "emergency brake" mechanism to transiently dampen gene expression.