INTRODUCTION: The third stage of labour occurs between the birth of the foetus and the expulsion of the placenta. A major complication during this stage is postpartum hemorrhage, which poses a significant concern for mat...INTRODUCTION: The third stage of labour occurs between the birth of the foetus and the expulsion of the placenta. A major complication during this stage is postpartum hemorrhage, which poses a significant concern for maternal health. To mitigate this risk, active management strategies have emerged, raising concerns about the safety of physiological management following a physiological birth. Midwives play a vital role in ensuring a safe third stage of labour by minimizing medical intervention and preventing postpartum hemorrhage. This scoping review aims to map the evidence on midwifery practices that support a physiological third stage of labour. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We retrieved articles from PUBMED, PsycINFO (via EBSCO), CINAHL (via EBSCO), LILACS, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Open Science Framework, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library, and JBI. RESULTS: The search yielded 2190 articles, with 1779 remaining after duplicates were removed. Screening identified 80 articles for review; 63 were excluded, resulting in 17 articles defining key findings. Two articles contributed to a theoretical framework for a physiological approach. Ten articles further discussed how midwives provide care during this stage to maintain normalcy. Three articles debated the safety of expectant management for low-risk women, while three studies also suggested new risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Midwifery care during the physiological third stage of labour must balance safety and trust in the woman's body. More research is needed to assess expectant management in home births and midwifery-led units, with a focus on individual needs and the long-term impacts of a physiological approach.
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, US hospitals have implemented novel interventions to reduce racism, bias, and their effects in perinatal healthcare (e.g., implicit bias training, anti-racism seminars). Healthcare workers...INTRODUCTION: In recent years, US hospitals have implemented novel interventions to reduce racism, bias, and their effects in perinatal healthcare (e.g., implicit bias training, anti-racism seminars). Healthcare workers may also encounter informal interventions in support of these goals (e.g., peer feedback on microaggressions). There is little scholarship on how equity-focused interventions affect clinicians and clinical teams. METHODS: Using qualitative in-depth interview data from 20 California hospital-based perinatal clinicians, we investigated changes in how perinatal clinicians approached their work following equity-focused interventions. RESULTS: Sixteen respondents discussed changes they observed in themselves or their colleagues. We categorized these as: (1) cognitive changes (e.g., recognizing one's own biased thinking and behavior; better understanding the role of racism in disparities); (2) individual behavior changes (e.g., speaking up about inequities; assessing and mitigating bias in one's own behavior; acting more intentionally when caring for patients at risk for worse outcomes); and (3) team behavior changes (e.g., greater intra-colleague discussion of equity topics; collective accountability; efforts to reduce the harms of bias in clinical care). Many described interventions that overlapped or even synergized with one another, including combinations of formal and informal efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that equity-focused interventions can produce observable changes in perinatal patient-care processes. However, it may be challenging for evaluators and healthcare leaders alike to understand what interventions, in what combinations and perinatal settings, produce desired results. Researchers will need innovative methods and a deep understanding of the intervention context to rigorously study these novel interventions-overlapping, multi-level, synergistic-and their effects.
BACKGROUND: Racial disparities negatively impact health issues, and racism is associated with worse maternal health outcomes. Satisfaction with childbirth is influenced by many factors according to women's preferences an...BACKGROUND: Racial disparities negatively impact health issues, and racism is associated with worse maternal health outcomes. Satisfaction with childbirth is influenced by many factors according to women's preferences and sociocultural beliefs. A positive birth experience allows for improving healthcare and promoting health. The study aim is to evaluate women's satisfaction with the labor and birth experience according to skin color. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with postpartum women who gave birth in a tertiary hospital. To assess satisfaction with childbirth, we applied the Mackey Satisfaction Scale. For statistical analysis, women's skin color was categorized into Black and non-Black. We categorize as Black people all persons who identify as Black and Brown. Sociodemographic and obstetric data were obtained from a collection form. For bivariate analysis, we used chi-square or Fisher's exact and the Mann-Whitney tests. The significance level was 5%, and the software used was SAS 9.4. RESULTS: A total of 300 postpartum women were included, 182 (60.7%) black skin color. Black women were less satisfied with the ability to deal with contractions (p = 0.046), comfort and well-being during labor (p = 0.035), control of actions during labor (p = 0.003) and delivery (p = 0.03), number of explanations received from the nursing staff (p = 0.039), physician's attitude (p = 0.023), and lower overall satisfaction with the birth experience (p = 0.013) compared to non-Black women. Black women had a lower overall satisfaction score (p = 0.011) and self-subscale score (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Black women had lower satisfaction scores with birth experience compared to non-Black ones. Reducing racial disparities in health is essential to improving obstetric assistance and care satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: One in five births is induced worldwide. There is increasing agreement on the importance of informed decision-making throughout pregnancy and birth. However, research suggests that birthing persons are not fu...BACKGROUND: One in five births is induced worldwide. There is increasing agreement on the importance of informed decision-making throughout pregnancy and birth. However, research suggests that birthing persons are not fully involved in the decision-making process regarding induction of labor (IOL) or receiving all the necessary information and options regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives. This study aimed to understand women's experiences of the decision-making process around an IOL and to analyse the demographic factors influencing their experiences and knowledge. METHODS: An online survey collecting quantitative and qualitative data from women who gave birth between 2018 and 2023 in Ireland was conducted. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyse a subset of data from the survey, focusing on decision-making and knowledge around inductions of labor. RESULTS: Of 1091 respondents, 49.3% reported not feeling fully involved in the decision around induction, 66.8% felt insufficiently informed about inductions, and 30% did not know that they could decline an induction. Age, parity, and type of maternity care were significantly associated with involvement in decision-making and knowledge of inductions and informed refusal. Involvement in decision-making, knowledge around inductions and informed refusal was significantly higher among women with previous pregnancies, and maternity care in private health care. DISCUSSION: A significant proportion of women did not feel well-informed on the benefits, risks, and alternatives around IOL. Suggested improvements include promoting care that respects maternal choices, preferences, and autonomy, and remains unbiased and nonjudgemental, while facilitating trusting relationships and open communication between patients and providers as a core foundation for consent and informed decision-making.
BACKGROUND: Limited medical professionals, particularly in rural community, impedes patient treatment. Rapid prenatal risk assessments are critical for improving pregnancy care under these resource constraints. OBJECTIVE...BACKGROUND: Limited medical professionals, particularly in rural community, impedes patient treatment. Rapid prenatal risk assessments are critical for improving pregnancy care under these resource constraints. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate an innovative digital system that assists midwives in recognizing prenatal risks and in making clinical decisions in maternity hospitals, especially in rural healthcare setups. METHODS: The technology, which is based on a smartphone application, assesses pregnancy risks and offers potential delivery insights. Researchers used data gathering, firebase integration, and an artificial intelligence model to perform a pilot study in rural health setups. The modified Alberta perinatal risk score is used and validated. Midwives are trained in the app's use and screened 1010 pregnant women at a primary health centres (PHC). RESULTS: Prenatal mother's data is securely maintained in JSON format, allowing for predictive evaluations of outcomes and intrapartum factors. The AI processes data and generates predictions for the Flutter App. Pilot results show that the app is effective at classifying prenatal cases, with 37.33% classified as low risk, 37.82% as intermediate risk, and 24.85% as high risk. High-risk cases are referred to facility-based centers, and midwives collaborated with medical officers to manage 62.04% of moderate and all low-risk cases. The app efficiently records maternal and neonatal outcomes, demonstrating its potential to improve patient care with a 99.0% accuracy rate in forecasting newborn fatalities using the Gradient Boost algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated android application with the AI antenatal risk assessment system improves midwives' obstetric risk assessment skills, allowing them to provide timely interventions to pregnant women, thus contributing to positive birthing outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to conduct a Turkish validity and reliability study of the Maternal Identity Scale. METHODS: This study employed a methodological approach. The study's sample population compri...BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to conduct a Turkish validity and reliability study of the Maternal Identity Scale. METHODS: This study employed a methodological approach. The study's sample population comprised 407 women who gave birth to infants between 4 and 12 months of age and who did not experience any postpartum health complications requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: The scale was found to comprise 23 items and three factors: Attachment to the Infant, Role Competence, and Gratification in the Role. These factors collectively explained 49.7% of the total variance. While the number of factors remains equivalent to the initial version of the scale, it deviates from the original in that the original scale comprises 24 items and accounts for approximately 33%-66% of the total variance. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated that the scale demonstrated acceptable model fit, as reflected by GFI = 0.92, AGFI = 0.90, NFI = 0.84, PGFI = 0.76, and RMR = 0.02. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall scale was calculated to be 0.84. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales were 0.81 for the attachment to the infant subscale, 0.76 for the role competence subscale, and 0.82 for gratification in the role. The scale evaluation relies on both sub-dimension and total mean scores. As the score on the scale increases, the development of maternal identity correspondingly increases. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that the Turkish version of the Maternal Identity Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing maternal identity in mothers with infants aged 4-12 months. Health professionals are advised to utilize the Maternal Identity Scale for the evaluation of maternal identity development in postpartum women.
PURPOSE: Using a decision-analytic model, we evaluated the outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness associated with birthing in the upright position compared to the recumbent position in patients with a low-dose epidural....PURPOSE: Using a decision-analytic model, we evaluated the outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness associated with birthing in the upright position compared to the recumbent position in patients with a low-dose epidural. METHODS: We designed a decision-analytic model using TreeAge Pro software to compare the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of employing the upright versus recumbent position during the first delivery with a low-dose epidural, incorporating the impact of mode of delivery on a subsequent delivery. We used a theoretical cohort of 756,000 patients, representing the approximate number of nulliparous individuals who have a term birth in the United States annually and are given an epidural. Probabilities and costs were derived from the literature. RESULTS: In our theoretical cohort of 756,000 nulliparous individuals with a low-dose epidural, the recumbent positioning strategy was associated with 18,652 fewer cesarean deliveries in the first pregnancy (66,210 vs. 84,862), which would lead to 11,228 fewer cesarean deliveries in the second pregnancy (135,787 vs. 147,015) in comparison to the upright position. The recumbent position was also associated with four fewer uterine ruptures (15 vs. 19) and one fewer hysterectomy (4 vs. 5) in the second pregnancy, two fewer maternal deaths (23 vs. 25) in the first delivery, and one fewer maternal death in the second delivery (26 vs. 27). Laboring in the recumbent position saved $157 million ($15.526 billion vs. $15.683 billion) and increased maternal QALYs by 2141 QALYs (19.846 million vs. 19.844 million). CONCLUSION: Our results show that in a theoretical cohort of 756,000 patients, laboring in the recumbent position may save $157 million annually and improve maternal outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating evidence-based cost and outcome data into patient counseling about birthing positions to support informed, shared decision-making while accounting for individual patient preferences.
OBJECTIVE: To compare sonographic, maternal, and clinical estimations of fetal weight in women with severe and morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m) at term. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on multiparous women with s...OBJECTIVE: To compare sonographic, maternal, and clinical estimations of fetal weight in women with severe and morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m) at term. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on multiparous women with singleton term pregnancies. We analyzed absolute error, absolute percentage error, and rates of error > 10%, > 15%, and > 20%; and error > 500 g for each method. RESULTS: Our study included 103 women with a median pre-delivery BMI of 37.9 (35.0-50.4) kg/m. Clinical estimation showed a higher mean error than maternal estimation (140.1 vs. -51.6 g, p < 0.001). The absolute error was comparable for the sonographic and maternal estimations (209 and 210 g, respectively); these values were lower (p = 0.02) than that of clinical estimation (250 g). For sonographic estimation, the absolute percentage error was lower than for the clinical estimation (6.0% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.018). Similarly, for the maternal estimation, the absolute error was lower than for the clinical estimation (6.3% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.005). A greater proportion of women exhibited an absolute percentage rate error exceeding 15% with clinical estimation than with maternal estimation (15.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.002). A higher proportion of women displayed an absolute percentage rate error exceeding 20% with clinical estimation than with sonographic estimation (7.8% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.016) and with maternal estimation (7.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m, sonographic weight estimation and maternal estimation showed similar levels of accuracy, and both surpassed that of clinical estimation. Our findings demonstrate the potential utility of maternal estimation as an additional tool supporting the standard use of ultrasound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05478798.
INTRODUCTION: Antepartum fetal surveillance, including nonstress tests, is designed to reduce the incidence of stillbirth. Despite widespread use, there is limited data regarding its efficacy and shared decision-making i...INTRODUCTION: Antepartum fetal surveillance, including nonstress tests, is designed to reduce the incidence of stillbirth. Despite widespread use, there is limited data regarding its efficacy and shared decision-making is advised. Our objective was to evaluate pregnant women's understanding of the rationale for antepartum fetal surveillance and explore its impact. METHODS: Seventeen subjects undergoing scheduled nonstress testing at a large medical center in Portsmouth, Virginia, USA were recruited for this qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews using a standardized guide were conducted and assessed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Review of the interview transcripts identified the emergence of five themes and nine subthemes. Several subjects highlighted logistical challenges and costs (both financial and nonfinancial) associated with more frequent visits. Participants referred for antenatal testing appear to have a narrow knowledge of its components, indications, and limitations and are unaware of the implications of abnormal results. Despite a high degree of uncertainty and costs incurred, most women were willing to undergo testing and generally found the process to be a source of comfort. CONCLUSION: Our thematic analysis of participants' perceptions suggests that during antepartum fetal surveillance, shared decision-making either does not always occur or that it is not fully optimized. Efforts to improve this process could emphasize more open communication, providing patient-centered, evidence-based information, and actively incorporating individual narratives into the counseling processes.
BACKGROUND: Understanding future demand for midwifery-led birth centers is critical to increasing utilization of this high-value model of care. This study examines factors associated with interest in birth center care fo...BACKGROUND: Understanding future demand for midwifery-led birth centers is critical to increasing utilization of this high-value model of care. This study examines factors associated with interest in birth center care for a future pregnancy. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Listening to Mothers in California survey. The study included 1447 people who had a singleton hospital birth in 2016 and did not have a history of cesarean birth. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted with variables that were aligned with the Coxon model of birth setting decision-making. RESULTS: More than half of respondents (n = 789; 54.5%) expressed interest in receiving care at a birth center in the future. Respondents were more likely to express interest in birth center care if they had experienced pressure to have an obstetric intervention (AOR 1.86, 95% CI = 1.83-1.90) or believed that birth is a natural process that should not be interfered with unless medically necessary (AOR 1.74, 95% CI = 1.71-1.78), compared to respondents who did not. They were also more likely to have sought information about hospital cesarean rates (AOR 1.50, 95% CI = 1.47-1.52), had a doula in labor (AOR 1.42, 95% CI = 1.39-1.45), and experienced mistreatment (AOR 1.23, 95% CI = 1.21-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Broadening access to midwifery-led birth centers to accommodate future demand is needed. Providing pregnant people with comparable quality measures of birth center and hospital care may facilitate informed decision-making. Improving the shared decision-making abilities of healthcare providers could help prevent instances of mistreatment or undue pressure on pregnant individuals to undergo obstetrical interventions.
INTRODUCTION: To gain more insight into psychological mechanisms associated with fear of childbirth (FoC), this study examined the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and FoC in nulliparous and multiparo...INTRODUCTION: To gain more insight into psychological mechanisms associated with fear of childbirth (FoC), this study examined the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and FoC in nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women, as well as the moderating role of maternal parity in this relationship, and the role of inhibitory IU and prospective IU in relation to FoC. METHODS: Validated Dutch versions of the Wijma Delivery Expectations Questionnaire version A (W-DEQ-A) and the Intolerance of Uncertainty scale (IUS-12) were filled out by 410 nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women. Statistical analyses in this cross-sectional study included correlation analyses and (multivariate) linear regression analyses. RESULTS: A significant, positive correlation was found between IU and FoC (ρ = 0.425, p < 0.001; b = 1.533, p < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression identified multiple variables contributing significantly to the level of FoC, with IU remaining the strongest predictor, both for the total group and for nulliparous and multiparous women separately. Maternal parity was not found to moderate the relationship between IU and FoC. Both inhibitory IU and prospective IU were significantly, positively associated with FoC. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of IU are positively associated with higher levels of FoC in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Psychological treatment targeting FoC may benefit from focusing on managing uncertainty and increasing psychological flexibility. Future research is needed to better understand the role of IU in FoC during pregnancy, in order to increase maternal mental health and improve (post-partum) mother-child relationships.
BACKGROUND: Perineal trauma remains a common outcome of spontaneous vaginal birth, often leading to immediate and long-term complications. Although numerous studies have examined clinical factors, the influence of indivi...BACKGROUND: Perineal trauma remains a common outcome of spontaneous vaginal birth, often leading to immediate and long-term complications. Although numerous studies have examined clinical factors, the influence of individual clinician characteristics-such as professional role, experience, training, and attitudes-has received less attention. AIM: This scoping review synthesized existing evidence on the association between clinician characteristics and variations in perineal outcomes including obstetric anal sphincter injury, episiotomy, spontaneous tears and intact perineum. The review also examined methods of risk assessment and strategies to mitigate trauma related to clinician factors. DESIGN: The review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to map the breadth of evidence in this field. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken across multiple electronic databases using predefined keywords and inclusion criteria. Sixty-two studies, published between 1969 and 2024 from 25 countries, were included. Study designs encompassed cohort, cross-sectional, randomized controlled trials, qualitative and mixed methods. RESULTS: Episiotomy was the primary outcome in 57 studies, while 27 studies focused on obstetric anal sphincter injury and 10 on intact perineum. Clinician factors, particularly professional role, attitudes, experience and education, were consistently associated with variations in perineal outcomes. Midwifery-led care frequently corresponded with lower episiotomy rates, although it was sometimes linked with similar or slightly higher spontaneous tear rates. CONCLUSION: Reducing perineal trauma requires addressing both fixed and modifiable clinician factors. Standardized episiotomy training, adherence to evidence-based guidelines and collaborative, woman-centered care are recommended strategies to enhance the quality of maternity care for improved patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a woman-centered approach to antenatal decision-making. Few studies have observed maternity clinicians' use of shared decision-making in antenatal clinic consultations. AIM: The aim...BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a woman-centered approach to antenatal decision-making. Few studies have observed maternity clinicians' use of shared decision-making in antenatal clinic consultations. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the recorded consultations in antenatal care between pregnant women and maternity clinicians, to ascertain if, when or how shared decision-making is used in antenatal care. METHODS: Twenty-six antenatal clinic consultations were audio-recorded with maternity clinicians and women. Data were analyzed using the Framework Method, within an analytical matrix designed around the 12 items of the validated observer measure of shared decision-making, the OPTION12 scale. FINDINGS: A total of 12 clinicians and 26 pregnant women were recruited to the study. There were significant limitations to shared decision-making in recorded consultations. Three themes were identified through the use of the Framework Method: Who decides?, Women constrained, and Clinicians omniscient. DISCUSSION: Reviewing the clinician communication as part of a framework matrix made visible latent themes of relationality and power imbalance between clinicians and pregnant women. Clinicians in this study shared clinical knowledge in a way that highlighted the power imbalance between the clinician and the woman. This study illustrates that shared decision-making is limited in these studied antenatal clinic consultations. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate how clinician communication can support or sabotage women's involvement in shared decision-making. The results of this study underscore the need for targeted efforts to more effectively integrate shared decision-making into routine antenatal care.
BACKGROUND: Compassionate care from healthcare professionals is vital for parents following perinatal loss. Changes to maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic affected perinatal loss care and illuminated the need for...BACKGROUND: Compassionate care from healthcare professionals is vital for parents following perinatal loss. Changes to maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic affected perinatal loss care and illuminated the need for new responses. This study reports Australian findings from an international collaboration (PUDDLES) of seven countries investigating parents' experiences of care following perinatal loss during COVID-19. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 mothers and 3 fathers who experienced stillbirth, neonatal death, or termination of pregnancy for medical reasons during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using template analysis. FINDINGS: An overarching theme "Compassionate care made up for a lot" described the ways healthcare professionals' actions either mitigated or exacerbated parents' distress beyond the inherent suffering associated with their baby's death. Three themes within this overarching theme were identified: (1) "Encountering a disrupted health system" included parents' experiences of health services and provider responses to COVID-19; (2) "Experiencing the loss-immediate and defining moments" captured how COVID-19-related changes affected crucial moments around the time of the loss and its immediate aftermath; and (3) "Entering a new level of isolation in the community" described lack of aftercare and restricted support opportunities following hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals' actions matter deeply for families during a time of devastating loss, and perhaps even more so when this coincides with a health system crisis. Embedding conditions and structures for compassionate perinatal loss care is both possible and essential.
BACKGROUND: Caesarean birth rates are rising worldwide, and projections show that by 2030, 28.5% of women worldwide (or 38 million) will give birth by caesarean delivery. The World Health Organization (WHO) has urged hea...BACKGROUND: Caesarean birth rates are rising worldwide, and projections show that by 2030, 28.5% of women worldwide (or 38 million) will give birth by caesarean delivery. The World Health Organization (WHO) has urged health professionals to limit caesarean births to those supported by medical evidence, with guidelines including the recommendations that all women be involved in their birthing decisions and for the caesarean birth (CB) rate not to exceed 10%-15%. However, it has been suggested that adhering to these rates may be detrimental to women and babies. The proportion of Maternal Request for Caesarean Birth (MRCB) varies significantly across the globe (0.2%-42%) averaging 3% of the five million caesarean births reported in a 2018 global review. The aim of this scoping review is to explore the breadth of the literature on health professionals' attitudes towards MRCB, to summarise the evidence and identify gaps in the current knowledge base, with a view to informing future research. METHODS: The scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. Four databases-CINAHL, Medline, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched from inception to 31 October 2024. A total of 48 quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were included. Data were charted to a template which included the categories: cohort, gender, methodology, rationale in practice, rationale for personal choice and key findings. RESULTS: Findings showed that the rates of health professionals willing to perform MRCB varied considerably between countries and rationale for performing them was multifactorial, encompassing both ethical and legal considerations. Rates for HPs choosing CB for themselves, or their partners were higher than the estimated global MRCB rates, and rationale for choice differed significantly from their rationale for performing a MRCB on their patients. The findings in relation to the attitudes of midwives towards MRCB were significant as they did not recognise tocophobia as a rationale for choosing MRCB and their counselling was aimed towards changing a woman's mind as opposed to respecting maternal autonomy. CONCLUSION: Precise and contemporaneous global reporting of MRCB rates is recommended, in conjunction with the implementation of specific MRCB guidelines and consent. Counselling education for health professionals could facilitate doctor-patient shared decision-making. Further research on non-medical interventions and their efficacy could address concerns in the global escalation of MRCB rates.
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy can be a difficult time for people who have experienced trauma. Trauma-informed care can address the needs of people who have experienced trauma. In the present study, we describe the creation of a...BACKGROUND: Pregnancy can be a difficult time for people who have experienced trauma. Trauma-informed care can address the needs of people who have experienced trauma. In the present study, we describe the creation of a trauma-informed multidisciplinary clinic for pregnant people with a history of trauma or birth trauma. METHODS: We considered the best practices for identifying and training key personnel, developing and implementing trauma-informed interventions, including the development of a trauma-informed birth plan, and designing procedures for patient identification and referral to the clinic. RESULTS: The implementation of trauma-informed procedures in the clinic and labor and delivery unit is described. All patients agreed to have the trauma-informed birth plan documented in the medical record. Trauma-informed birth plans were well received by staff who reported it was easy to find and clearly documented. Patients reported many of their goals were achieved and that care teams utilized the birth plan. Importantly, the patient experience in the multidisciplinary clinic was positive even if the birth experience and delivery were medically complicated. CONCLUSION: The present work demonstrates that a trauma-informed multidisciplinary clinic can address the specific needs of people who have experienced trauma or a traumatic birth. It further demonstrates that trauma-informed interventions can be delivered by a multidisciplinary team across outpatient and inpatient settings and successfully communicated to staff not directly involved in the clinic, but involved in patient care. Hospitals providing care to pregnant people should consider creating a trauma-informed multidisciplinary clinic to support patients with traumatic experiences.
BACKGROUND: Black birthing people experience disproportionately high rates of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Doula support is associated with improved birth outcomes and can help reduce racial disparities,...BACKGROUND: Black birthing people experience disproportionately high rates of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Doula support is associated with improved birth outcomes and can help reduce racial disparities, yet culturally congruent doulas face hurdles practicing in the healthcare setting. This quality improvement project aimed to understand the experiences of Black doulas in Nebraska to enhance integration into healthcare systems. METHODS: Three group-based interviews were conducted as part of a quality improvement project in August 2023 with six Black doulas practicing in Nebraska. Participants were recruited through community organizations and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews explored doula practices, barriers, motivations, and sources of support. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged: (1) Barriers inhibiting Black doulas in the healthcare setting, (2) Facilitators of a doula-friendly clinical environment, and (3) Coping strategies. Doulas described facing resistance, stereotypes, and a lack of understanding about their role from some healthcare staff, contrasted with client advocacy. Self-care strategies and peer support networks were critical for sustainable practice. CONCLUSION: Despite systemic barriers, Black doulas play a vital role in supporting Black families and addressing inequities. Recommendations include implementing doula-friendly policies, addressing bias, fostering an inclusive environment in healthcare facilities, and enhancing the integration of culturally concordant doula support to improve outcomes for Black birthing people.
BACKGROUND: Previous trial-based or modeling studies of cost differences between births following induction of labor (IOL) and expectant management (EM) showed mixed findings and did not account for the full range of cos...BACKGROUND: Previous trial-based or modeling studies of cost differences between births following induction of labor (IOL) and expectant management (EM) showed mixed findings and did not account for the full range of costs at a population level. METHODS: We included singleton, cephalic, and term live births between 01/07/2016 and 30/06/2018 in public hospitals of one Australian state (Queensland). We excluded individuals with a previous cesarean birth, no labor, and specific maternal conditions. The mean costs per pregnancy (AUD 2021/22), capturing all health service events and prescription medications accessed during the month of labor and birth, were compared. Generalized linear models were used to calculate cost ratios (CR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The analysis included 30,924 births. The mean costs per pregnancy (combined women and neonates) were higher for IOL at each week of gestation (37-40), compared with EM, both before and after adjustment, regardless of parity. The largest ($7684, CR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.23-1.40) and smallest ($1502, CR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09) cost differences were found among nulliparous women at 37 and 39 weeks, respectively. Maternal inpatient admissions largely drove these cost differences. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that higher costs associated with IOL in low-risk women are likely due to the intervention itself-such as increased intrapartum procedures or complications-rather than underlying maternal risk. This supports previous evidence of higher cesarean rates after IOL and highlights the need for further evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in the Australian context.
INTRODUCTION: Primary tokophobia is a potent and pathological fear of pregnancy and childbirth. This condition can affect both nulliparous women and childless men and compel them to entirely refrain from parenthood, thus...INTRODUCTION: Primary tokophobia is a potent and pathological fear of pregnancy and childbirth. This condition can affect both nulliparous women and childless men and compel them to entirely refrain from parenthood, thus leading to a childless life. However, the dearth of validated Arabic scales assessing this construct hinders research in Arabic-speaking populations. Therefore, this study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Childbirth Fear-Prior to Pregnancy scale (CFPP) within the Lebanese population. METHODS: We recruited 1269 participants (651 nulliparous women and 618 childless men) in a cross-sectional study via social media snowball sampling. The questionnaire included the CFPP scale and other Arabic-validated measures of primary tokophobia and psychological distress. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis of the CFPP scale confirmed its unidimensional nature, and the scale's reliability was excellent. In addition, the CFPP scale demonstrated gender invariance. Convergent validity was established by strong correlations between the CFPP scale and the Tokophobia Severity Scale (TSS) in women as well as the Fathers' Fear of Childbirth Scale (FFCS) in men. Modest, but significant correlations between the CFPP scores and anxiety/depression measures also suggested that the scale specifically captures childbirth fear rather than psychological distress, supporting its divergent validity. CONCLUSION: Validating the Arabic CFPP scale for both women and men in an understudied Arabic population, our study offers a valuable tool for identifying childbirth fear prior to pregnancy. This validated scale can improve detection, inform support services, and ultimately benefit both men and women experiencing primary tokophobia. Furthermore, our study paves the way for cross-cultural research tackling cultural influences on primary tokophobia, particularly in non-Western countries.